STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE

The application of statistical methods for the analysis of random processes to obtain quantitative estimates for the performance indicators of photovoltaic plants as a stochastic energy source is considered. The power generation process is represented by a set of daily random functions with their re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2024
Hauptverfasser: Vasko, P., Mazurenko, I., Sysak , R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Ukrainisch
Veröffentlicht: Institute of Renewable Energy National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2024
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://ve.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/461
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Vidnovluvana energetika
Завантажити файл: Pdf

Institution

Vidnovluvana energetika
_version_ 1871103773580984320
author Vasko, P.
Mazurenko, I.
Sysak , R.
author_facet Vasko, P.
Mazurenko, I.
Sysak , R.
author_institution_txt_mv [ { "author": " P. Vasko", "institution": "Institute of Renewable Energy, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine" }, { "author": " I. Mazurenko", "institution": "Institute of Renewable Energy, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine" }, { "author": "R. Sysak ", "institution": " Institute of Renewable Energy, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine" } ]
author_sort Vasko, P.
baseUrl_str https://ve.org.ua/index.php/journal/oai
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2026-07-18T06:32:20Z
description The application of statistical methods for the analysis of random processes to obtain quantitative estimates for the performance indicators of photovoltaic plants as a stochastic energy source is considered. The power generation process is represented by a set of daily random functions with their respective trends and stochastic components. One hour was taken as the minimum stationari-ty interval of trend’s statistical characteristics. A time period of 16 years was studied to obtain statistically stable estimates. The meteorological database SARAH2 was used as a source of hourly data on the density of solar irradiance, ambient temperature and wind speed in the middle part of the Azov-Black Sea region of Ukraine. For mathematical modelling of power generation and electricity production processes, specialized software PVGIS version 5.2 of the European Commission was used. Hourly quantitative estimates of expected daily power generation trends for each month of the year, as well as their correlation functions, were computed. Algorithms were developed and levels of probabilistic assurance for hourly generated power were evaluated. Statistical estimates of the expected daily, monthly, and annual volumes of electricity production by photovoltaic power plants were studied, taking into account the meteorological conditions in the said region.
doi_str_mv 10.36296/1819-8058.2024.2(77).105-116
first_indexed 2025-07-17T11:39:30Z
format Article
fulltext 105 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика УДК 621.311.25: 628.165 https://doi.org/10.36296/1819-8058.2024.2(77)105-116 STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE Received Apr. 02, 2024; accepted Jun. 21, 2024 Available online Jul. 01, 2024 Vasko P.1, Mazurenko I.2, Sysak R.3 Author for correspondence: Vasko Petro, e-mail: ivevasko@gmail.com The application of statistical methods for the analysis of random processes to obtain quantitative estimates for the performance indicators of photovoltaic plants as a stochastic energy source is considered. The power generation process is represented by a set of daily random functions with their respective trends and stochastic components. One hour was taken as the minimum stationari-ty interval of trend’s statistical characteristics. A time period of 16 years was studied to obtain statistically stable estimates. The meteorological database SARAH2 was used as a source of hourly data on the density of solar irradiance, ambient temperature and wind speed in the middle part of the Azov-Black Sea region of Ukraine. For mathematical modelling of power generation and electricity production processes, specialized software PVGIS version 5.2 of the European Commission was used. Hourly quantitative estimates of expected daily power generation trends for each month of the year, as well as their correlation functions, were computed. Algorithms were developed and levels of probabilistic assurance for hourly generated power were evaluated. Statistical estimates of the expected daily, monthly, and annual volumes of electricity production by photovoltaic power plants were studied, taking into account the meteorological conditions in the said region. Bibl. 48, Tables 2, Fig. 8. Key words: random function, electricity, probability, power, solar irradiance, statistics, photovoltaic plant. СТАТИСТИЧНА ОЦІНКА ПОКАЗНИКІВ ФУНКЦІОНУВАННЯ ФОТОЕЛЕКТРИЧНИХ СТАНЦІЙ ЯК ДЖЕРЕЛА ЕНЕРГІЇ ДЛЯ ОПРІСНЕННЯ ВОДИ В АЗОВО-ЧОРНОМОРСЬКОМУ РЕГІОНІ УКРАЇНИ Отримано 02 квіт. 2024 р.; рекомендовано до публікації 21 чер. 2024 р. Доступно онлайн 01 лип. 2024 р. Васько П. Ф.1, Мазуренко І. Л.2, Сисак Р. М.3 Автор для кореспонденції: Васько Петро, e-mail: ivevasko@gmail.com Розглянуто застосування статистичних методів аналізу випадкових процесів для отримання кількісних оцінок показ- ників функціонування фотоелектричних станцій як стохас- тичного джерела енергії. Процес генерування електроенер- гії представлено сукупністю щоденних випадкових функцій зі своїм трендом та стохастичною складовою. За мінімальний інтервал стаціонарності статисти- чних характеристик тренду приймалась одна година. Досліджувався період часу тривалістю 16 років для отримання статистично стійких оцінок. Використовувалась метеорологічна база даних SARAH2 з погодинною інформацією про щільність сонячного випромінювання, температуру навколишнього середовища та швидкість вітру в середній частині Азово-Чорноморського регіону України. Для 1 Dr. of Tech. Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8807-7173 2 Cand. of Tech. Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-7396 3 Cand. of Tech. Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-4776 1,2,3 Institute of Renewable Energy, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine 1 д-р техн. наук https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8807-7173 2 канд. техн. наук https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-7396 3 канд. техн. наук. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4474-4776 1,2,3 Інститут відновлюваної енергетики НАН України, м. Київ, Україна 106 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика математичного моделювання процесів генерування потужності та виробництва електроенергії за- стосовувалось спеціалізоване програмне забезпе-чення PVGIS версії 5.2 Європейської Комісії. Отри- мано очікувані погодинні кількісні оцінки параметрів щоденних трендів генерування потужності для кожного місяця року та їх кореляційні функції. Розроблено алгоритми та визначено ймовір-нісні рівні забезпеченості щогодинної генерованої потужності. Досліджено статистичні оцінки очікуваних ден- них, місячних та річних обсягів виробництва електроенергії фотоелектростанціями з урахуванням метеорологічних умов регіону. Бібл. 48, табл. 2, рис. 8. Ключові слова: випадкова функція, електроенергія, імовірність, потужність, сонячне випромінювання, статистика, фотоелектрична станція. Introduction. The importance of the problem of water de- salination on the industrial scale in the Azov-Black Sea re- gion of Ukraine is caused, first of all, by the need to prepare fresh water for the electrolytic production of “green” hy- drogen, in accordance with Ukraine’s participation in the implementation of the European program “2x40 GW Green Hydrogen Initiative” [1, 2]. The program envisages the con- struction of 10 GW capacity of electrolysers on the territory of Ukraine for the production of low-emission hydrogen in the amount of 1.65 million tons per year. That, in turn, will stipulate the demand for prepared fresh water of at least 24 million m3/year [3]. It’s important to note that the needs for fresh water in Azov-Black Sea region of the country are not limited only to the implementation of the “green” hy- drogen production program. The use of water desalination technologies is relevant both in industry and the private sector for the preparation of drinking water, for agriculture and desalination of mine waters [4 – 8]. The choice of an acceptable desalination technology depends on the com- position and content of salts in the feed water and also the requirements to desalinated water’s properties [9 – 12]. Each technology is characterized by the corresponding costs and amounts of energy consumed to produce a unit of fresh water (kW∙h/m3, kJ/kg, etc). Energy supply for tech- nological processes can be based on either fossil fuels or renewable sources [13 – 15]. The southern territories of the country have the highest potential of wind energy and solar irradiance. A number of powerful wind power plants (WPP) and photovoltaic power plants (PVP) have already been constructed and commissioned there [16]. The use of en- ergy from WPPs and PVPs has no alternative for the pro- duction of “green” hydrogen, taking into account the stage of desalinated water preparation for the operation of elec- trolysers. The general view of a high-output PVP on the ter- ritory of Ukraine is shown in Fig. 1 [17]. This paper aims at investigating indicators of the PVP’s sto- chastic power generation process to achieve the maximum integration of its energy into the technological schemes of water desalination in the climatic conditions of the Azov- Black Sea region of Ukraine. The stochastic changes of the generated power are caused by the influence of cloudiness, air temperature, and wind speed at the PVP’s location [18]. However, the energy equipment of desalination facilities operates under a stable power supply, thus requiring coor- dination in time of the power consumption and generation processes [19 – 21]. The search for acceptable compromise solutions regarding the implementation of rational modes of energy generation and consumption requires the deter- mination of equipment load diagrams of the desalination technological scheme and statistical estimations of the sto- chastic process of electrical energy generation at the PVP. Fig. 1. General view of a high-output PVP [17] 107 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика The measurements of the PVP’s generated power during several individual days, which are shown in Fig. 2, indicate that it is appropriate to use the principles of random pro- cesses theory [22 – 24] to analyse the variability of the PVP’s operation indicators (power and volume of electric- ity production). Therefore, the stochastic process of PVP’s power generation during long time intervals can be repre- sented by a set of daily random functions; statistical methods for the analysis of such processes are covered in [25 – 28]. Problem statement. The main task of this study is to deter- mine the quantitative statistical estimates of the parameters of power generation stochastic processes and the PVP’s elec- tricity production in the climatic conditions of the Azov-Black Sea region of Ukraine. The set of daily random functions of PVP power generation, that is necessary for achieving statis- tically stable results, will be formed using mathematical modelling of the photo-voltaic modules’ operation modes and information about the changes in meteorological factors at the plant’s location over a long time [18, 29, 30]. Fig. 2. Set of daily random functions of PVP’s power generation Mathematical modelling of power generation processes and outputs of the PVP and processing of the results. The main components of the high-output PVP’s electrical circuit include photovoltaic modules (PVM), photovoltaic batter- ies, inverters, internal power transmission lines, internal transformer substations, a diagnostic and monitoring sys- tem, a control system, output transformer substations and power transmission lines for connection to the industrial power system or power consumer [31, 32]. PVM is the smallest component that can be connected to the electric circuit of the PVP. The nominal power of modern industrial PVMs is usually less than 600 W, therefore PVPs have a dis- tributed structure with a large number of components. So, in particular, a typical electrical scheme of a 50 MW PVP includes approx. 200,000 PVMs, 2,200 inverters, and 40 in- ternal transformer substations (0.4/10 kV). During operation, some part of the components fails and needs to be replaced, losses of electrical energy in the equip- ment and transmission lines exist, and there is a degradation of photovoltaic properties of PVMs. All this together decreases the power efficiency of the PVP. Degradation of PVM’s photo- voltaic properties is caused by temperature changes cyclicity, the influence of the ultraviolet spectrum of solar radiation and hot spots on photocells, the cracks appearing on the module surfaces and sealing failures [33, 34]. PVM manufacturers pro- vide warranties regarding yearly degradation level, that de- pends on the type of modules and can change in the range of (0.25...0.8)% per operation year [35]. Considering the above and theoretical principles of photo- voltaic energy [18, 29, 30, 32], let’s write down the initial expressions for determining the generated power of the PVP at an arbitrary moment in time (t) as follows: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )tPNktktNktPNtP nedgns ,, = , (1) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )tkftItP nrn =  ,,, 1 , (2) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )tvtQtPftk nn ,,2= , (3) where ( )tPs – power of the PVP; N – number of PVMs in the PVP; ( )tPn – power of the PVM; gk – equipment avail- ability factor of the PVP; dk – degradation factor of the PVM; ek – factor of electrical power losses in the compo- nents of power plant (internal electrical joins, invertors, transformer substations, tie lines); rI – solar energy flow density;  , – geographical coordinates at the PVP loca- tion; φ – tilt-angle between the PVM surface and the hori- zontal plane; α – azimuth of the PVM surface normal rela- tive to the South; nk – PVM efficiency ratio; v,Q – air temperature and wind speed at the PVP’s location. Set of equations (1) – (3) allows for mathematical modelling of PVP power depending on the climatic conditions at the construction site, spatial arrangement and electrical per- formance of the PVM, and the power plant design. Climatic conditions are characterized by the solar energy flow density on a clear day, the presence of cloudiness, air PS(t, 1) 05:00 20:00 ti ti+k t, hrs PS(t, 2) PS(t, j) t, hrs t, hrs 108 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика temperature and wind speed. Density values rI depend on geographic coordinates, meteorological factors, and time of day. Daily trend of the rI value changes is uniquely deter- mined by the trajectory of the solar irradiance flow relative to the PVM surface [36], and the stochastic component – by the rate of change in cloud cover, ambient temperature, and wind speed. In order to obtain statistically stable estimates of values ( ) ,,tIr , it is required to possess the results of meteorological observations at long time intervals [37]. The necessary information for the territory of the Azov-Black Sea region of Ukraine can be found in the international data- bases of NASA SSE (NASA Surface meteorology and Solar En- ergy) and PVGIS (Photovoltaic Geographical Information Sys- tem) of the European Commission. Further research will use the PVGIS database [38 – 40], which provides weather infor- mation on solar irradiance, air temperature, and wind speed at a height of 10 meters above the Earth’s surface for 16 years: from 2005 to 2020, inclusive. In accordance with methodological recommendations on the applied analysis of hydro-meteorological factors [41], the use of a period of 16 consecutive years is sufficient to determine trend fluctua- tions and random features of the process. PVGIS software version 5.2 [42] implements hourly calculations of PVM power with arbitrary orientation of its surface, taking into ac- count ambient temperature and wind cooling. Therefore, ap- plication of the mentioned software allows for obtaining quantitative values of expressions (1) – (3), which, after data systematization, can be represented by a set of daily random functions of the generated power ( )itPs , , as it is shown in Fig 2, and random sequence of values (time series) of the power at fixed moments of day time tj for the set of random functions: ( ) YititP jjs ...,,2,1,24...,,2,1,, == , (4) where Y – number of observations of the daily random functions of the PVP’s generated power. Sequential values of the time series, in contrast to simple sta- tistical samplings, can be mutually dependent for the closely located observations. The strength of the mutual depend- ency is determined by physical properties of the process and by discretization step of the sample time moments. We will perform the statistical processing of the defined above random process of the PVP power generation, ac- cording to the periodical changes of the meteorological fac- tors [37, 41] and the capabilities of the specified software, for the hourly, daily, and monthly time intervals during the 16-year period of consecutive years using the mathemati- cal principles from [24, 25, 43]. We will determine the daily trend ( )jsm tP of the random function of power generation for a particular month of the year (m) by computing the set of its average values at fixed time moments tj during the entire period of observation: ( ) ( ) = = mmYD i jsm mm jsm itP YD tP 1 , 1 , 24...,,2,1=jt , (5) where m – sequential number of the month in the year, Ym – number of the same months m within the observation pe- riod, Dm – number of days in the month m, ( )itP jsm , – ran- dom sequence of the values of power at the fixed day time moments tj for month m. The average values ( )jsm tP characterize a center of varia- tion of the random process of power generation at the fixed time moments of the specified month of the year. The var- iation of the random power generation value around the center is characterized by standard deviation σpm: ( ) ( ) ( )( ) = = − − = m mY k D i jsmjsm mm jpm tPitP YD t 1 1 22 , 1 1  , 24...,,2,1=jt , (6) The strength of interdependency of the random se- quence members ( )itP jsm , is determined by normalized correlation function ( ),jm tr : ( ) ( ) ( )jpmjmjm ttRtr 2,,  = , ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) − −+− −− =     mmYD i jsmjsmjsmjsm mm jm tPitPtPitP YD tR ,, 1 1 , , (7) 24...,,2,1=jt , ...,4,3,2,1= . The measure of correlation relationship is the correlation interval d, that characterizes an average number of days between intersections j and (j + d) of the random sequence, beyond which the values of the generated power can be considered as practically independent random variables. For the considered task, the value of correlation interval can be understood as the expected duration of continuous total cloudiness. Quantitatively, the value of correlation co- efficient ( )jm td at fixed day time moments tj for month m will be determined from the following condition: ( ) 02.0, jm tr for ( )jm td . (8) Probability distribution of the random sequence is an im- portant statistical property of the considered quantity. However, for the task of integration of electrical energy from renewable sources into technological schemes of wa- ter desalination, it is more important to know the duration of power generation [44]. Therefore, in further analysis, we will use the statistical characteristic of the probabilistic as- surance of the achievable levels of the generated power ( )Ptz jpm , . We will understand the mathematical essence of variable z as the probability for the random value of power to be greater than some given value P. Calculation of the probabilistic assurance will be performed with the 109 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика use of random sequence ( )itP jsm , . Let’s divide the range of smP variation into G intervals of the same width, moreo- ver, let ( )gtP jsm , be a middle of interval g, where g = 1, 2, …, G. Based on the sequence ( )itP jsm , , let’s build ordered list of its values and then count a number ( )gtn jpm , of samples that fall in every interval. Depend- ency ( )Ptz jpm , is computed as follows: ( ) ( )   ( )   −= PgtPGg jpm mm jpm jsm gtn DY Ptz ,,1 , 1 1, , [p.u.],     mDzz = p.u.days . (9) Estimation of the expected amount of PVP electrical en- ergy production is computed for monthly and yearly time intervals based on the daily trend of the random function of power generation for a particular month of year (5): ( )  =  = mm m YD i Tj jsm mm sm itP YD E 1 , 1 , (10) = 12 1 sms EE , (11) where smE , sE – expected monthly and yearly amount of PVP electrical energy production; mT – interval of energy generation in month m. Dispersion of monthly amount of electrical power produc- tion (σem) around the corresponding average values is de- termined as: ( )( ) = − − = mmYD i smsm mm em EiE YD 1 22 1 1  , ( ) ( )  = mTj jsmsm itPiE , . (12) Calculation of the probabilistic assurance of the daily elec- trical energy production amount during a month will be performed according to the described algorithm for the generated power: ( ) ( )   ( )   −= EgEGg em mm em sm gn DY Ez ,1 1 1 , [p.u.],     mDzz = p.u.days , (13) where ( )gEsm – middle of interval g built for the random sequence ( )iEsm , ( )gnem – number of samples that fall in the interval g. Numerical experiment and analysis of results. Computa- tions were performed for a hypothetical PVP with installed capacity of 1 kW, located in the central part of the Azov-Black Sea region of Ukraine. For this value of the installed capacity, all obtained quantitative results will be equivalent to the in- dicators of a plant with arbitrary power represented in p.u., and therefore can be easily scaled for a designed PVP with desired capacity. The following provisions and assumptions were used to conduct the numerical experiment: − computations are performed for the first operation year of the PVP, without consideration of the degradation of electrical properties of the photovoltaic modules; − total power losses in the PVP, including the reliability of the components, are equal to 14%; − crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels are used; − lower limit for the sensitivity of the modules to luminos- ity is estimated around 150 W/m2; − the panels mounting is fixed-tilt, with tilt angle corre- sponding to the geographical latitude of the central part of the region 47° (longitude 35°), azimuth – 0°; − database of solar irradiance – PVGIS-SARAH2 with hourly data for the time period of 2005-2020. The obtained functional dependencies of the daily trend, as well as its standard deviation, for all months of the year, are shown in Fig. 3. They have a convex shape, which is a direct consequence of the daily cycle of solar activity. According to the obtained results, the process of annual power gen- eration can be represented by three typical periods with corresponding quantitative indicators: “winter” period from November to February, “spring-summer” period from April to September, and “transient period” including March and October. In the “winter” period, it is possible to gener- ate power for (7-8) hours a day. The power trend values are low compared to the installed capacity of the PVP, and sig- nificant variability of the generation process is observed. These peculiarities are caused by significant cloudiness var- iability, which is typical for this period of the year. For the “spring-summer” period, the daily duration of generation is expected to be within (11-12) hours with significant power and low variability. In the most advantageous hours, the maximum value of the power trend reaches the level of (0.60-0.64) kW, which is comparable to the nominal value of the generated power of 0.86 kW (according to the con- ditions of the numerical experiment, described above). The obtained power ratios indicate a low probability of cloudi- ness at noon in the specified months. Estimates of the normalized correlation function were com- puted for each working hour of each month. The amount of obtained information is too large for a detailed presenta- tion in this publication, therefore we will only present the results for the middle of the daylight hours in the typical months of the above-mentioned periods of the year (Fig. 4). According to the calculated dependencies, the in- terruption of PVP power generation is expected in August, due to continuous cloudiness, for at least 3 consecutive days. For other months, the interruption of generation can be observed for more than a week. Probabilistic assurance of achievable levels of generated power was calculated for each working hour of each month, too. As an example, the obtained functional de- pendencies for two different hours of the day of typical months are presented in Fig. 5, where the selected points on the curves correspond to the average values of the daily trend in the PVP power output for the corresponding month at the indicated hours. 110 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика Fig. 3. Daily trend and standard deviation of the random power generation function 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ january 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ july 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ february 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ august 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 15:00 17:00 13:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ march 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ september 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ april 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ october 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ may 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ november 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ june 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 07:00 09:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 ti, hrs P, σ, kW Р σ december 111 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика Fig. 4. Dependencies of the normalized correlation function for typical months at 12 o’clock Fig. 5. Curves of probabilistic assurance of PVP power for 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. of some months The results of power generation around (12:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.) of the day characterize the area of maximum values of the monthly trends in the plant’s energy efficiency (Fig. 3). Therefore, the levels of probabilistic assurance of generated power, determined for this moment in time, will represent achievable values for each month during the year. The information shown in Fig. 5 makes it possible to determine achievable quantitative values of indicators for typical months of the above-mentioned periods of the year. For example, in August at 12:00 a.m., the generation will exceed the monthly daily average value for 23 days, in April – 18 days, in October – 17 days, in January – 8 days. Simi- larly, the probabilistic assurance of other generation out- puts can be determined. In particular, power generation of more than 0.5 kW will be observed for 6 days in January, 17 days in October, 21 days in April, and 27 days in August. For the 9:00 a.m., power generation of more than 0.3 kW will be observed for 1 day in January, 15 days in October, 18 days in April, and 27 days in August. According to the obtained results (Fig. 5), the maximum power value is observed in April and reaches 0.92 kW, whereas the maximum value in August is 0.82 kW. This situation is caused by the influence of the ambient temperature and cooling of the photovoltaic panels by wind on the efficiency of the solar irradiance photoelectric conversion process. The amount of electricity production is determined by the pa- rameters of the daily power trend and the duration of genera- tion in the specified time intervals. In this work, we analyzed daily, monthly and annual volumes of production. Indicators of the PVP’s daily electricity production for different months of the year are given in Table 1 and partially visualized in Fig. 6 in the form of annual trends of the average value and standard deviation. In the winter period, the process of electricity -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 rm(ti, τ) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 τ, days august october juanuary april 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Р, kW 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 z, days 12:00 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 09:00 z, days Р, kW 112 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика production is characterized by significant variability, when the value of standard deviation reaches the level of the average value, which is due to the presence of cloudiness in this period of time. The electricity output in the winter season is almost three times smaller than in the summer months. In particular, the average value of the daily electricity production in August is about 4.8 kW∙h/day, while in January it is only 1.4 kW∙h/day. The total duration of electricity generation in August is 372 hours, in April – 360 hours, in October – 300 hours, in January – 248 hours. Table 1. Indicators of daily electricity production of PVP by months of the year Indicators Months Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Emax , kW∙h/day 5.200 5.998 6.559 6.748 6.525 5.993 5.887 6.079 6.140 5.834 5.189 4.688 E , kW∙h/day 1.407 2.059 3.443 4.251 4.506 4.488 4.604 4.793 4.257 3.171 1.928 1.275 σ , kW∙h/day 1.36 1.754 1.876 1.745 1.329 1.13 0.979 1.063 1.472 1.783 1.554 1.255 Tm, hours 248 254 310 360 372 390 403 372 330 300 269 248 Fig. 6. Trends in the PVP’s daily electricity outputs by months of the year The obtained functional dependencies of the probability of the daily volume of electric energy production at a monthly time interval are presented in Fig. 7 for the most representa- tive months of the respective seasons. The maximum possi- ble value of the daily production is observed in the month of April, the same as in the case of power generation. The total duration of generation on the level of average daily produc- tion or above is expected in August for 20 days, in April – 17 days, in October – 16 days, in January – 10 days. For example, a daily volume of electric energy production of more than 4 kW∙h/day will be observed in August for 25 days, in April – 18 days, in October – 12 days, in January – 2 days. Exceeding the daily production volume of 5 kW∙h/day will be observed in August for 18 days, in April – 13 days, in October – 6 days, in January – for less than one day. Probabilistic assurance of other values of the daily amount of electricity production for any month of the year can be determined in a similar way based on the data in Table 2. The results of calculation studies with respect to the annual electricity production are presented in Fig. 8. The highest electricity production within the investi- gated time interval was observed in 2020 – nearly 1,300 kW∙h/year, and the lowest in 2006 – 1,120 kW∙h/year. Consequently, the value of the capacity factor of this PVP changes in the range (0.128 - 0.148) p.u. There are signs of climatic cyclicity in the amount of electricity production with a duration of (3-5) years. Fig. 7. Probabilistic assurance of the daily volumes of electrical energy production for monthly time interval 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Е, kW h/day кВт·год/день 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 σ kW∙h/day Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec z, days 113 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика Table 2. Probabilistic assurance of the PVP’s daily volumes of electrical energy by months, days z, days Е, kW·h/day Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 5.200 5.998 6.559 6.748 6.525 5.993 5.887 6.079 6.140 5.834 5.189 4.688 2 4.182 5.296 6.160 6.254 5.981 5.684 5.605 5.748 5.779 5.468 4.447 3.934 4 3.512 4.769 5.872 6.082 5.851 5.576 5.520 5.674 5.613 5.258 4.119 3.189 6 2.822 3.763 5.578 5.973 5.742 5.477 5.438 5.601 5.521 5.062 3.817 2.399 8 1.939 2.893 5.177 5.791 5.616 5.358 5.341 5.525 5.399 4.793 3.248 1.869 10 1.421 2.199 4.576 5.533 5.460 5.214 5.237 5.460 5.295 4.550 2.659 1.389 12 1.157 1.752 4.127 5.257 5.237 5.045 5.131 5.409 5.143 4.159 2.011 1.039 14 0.843 1.371 3.748 4.934 4.975 4.882 5.009 5.291 4.942 3.677 1.551 0.767 16 0.718 1.033 3.294 4.536 4.748 4.720 4.836 5.159 4.623 3.235 1.138 0.650 18 0.615 0.825 2.813 3.878 4.477 4.539 4.668 4.967 4.300 2.913 0.795 0.518 20 0.529 0.654 2.447 3.468 4.243 4.256 4.425 4.728 3.954 2.323 0.687 0.418 22 0.472 0.547 1.984 2.997 3.865 3.899 4.258 4.492 3.429 1.788 0.548 0.372 24 0.382 0.442 1.580 2.250 3.573 3.590 4.008 4.224 2.858 1.218 0.457 0.317 26 0.305 0.360 1.152 1.770 3.163 3.045 3.647 3.828 2.201 0.767 0.357 0.269 28 0.251 0.205 0.871 1.225 2.478 2.237 3.198 3.366 1.392 0.592 0.267 0.225 30 0.186 - 0.636 0 1.354 0 2.246 1.869 0 0.430 0 0.162 Fig. 8. Annual volumes of electricity production of the PVP within the studied time interval Discussion. The statistically estimated energy indicators for the PVP’s power generation process are given for a plant with the fixed-tilt mounting of PVMs and their orientation to the South. The tilt angle was equivalent to the geograph- ical latitude at the installation location (φ). That slope was justified by estimation of the annual volume of electrical energy production with variable angle in the range from (φ – 20) to (φ + 20). Increasing the tilt angle leads to a de- crease in production volume, therefore this range of angle change was not studied. When the slope decreases, an in- crease in volumes is observed. However, at the edge of the specified range the increase is as small as approx. 5%, due to weaker cooling of the structure by wind and consequent increase in the PVM’s temperature. As a result, the output of electrical energy decreases in autumn-winter period, which causes significant variability in the production amount throughout the year. The stochastic component of the generated output remain virtually unchanged within the specified range of changes in the tilt angle. An increase in the PVM’s temperature contributes to faster degrada- tion of their energy properties. It is worth noting that a spe- cific value of PVM tilt angle for a particular plant will also depend on conditions for cleaning the surface of the mod- ules from dust, which improve when the angle increases. These conditions vary depending on the location of the sta- tion and its power. Therefore, the quantitative results pre- sented in the publication can be used in feasibility studies for PVP construction projects in the Azov-Black Sea region, and then refined at the stage of operational design by ap- plying specific input data and using specialized commercial software. The calculation of quantitative statistical estimates of the PVP’s energy indicators was based on the determination of the daily trend in power generation and its random compo- nent for each month of the year separately using an 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 7 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 Е, kW h/year 114 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика observation interval of 16 years. The duration of the sta- tionarity interval was equal to one hour according to the used database of historical data. Therefore, the obtained characteristics of the probabilistic assurance of power lev- els and correlation functions at monthly time intervals are characterized by significant reliability and allow quantita- tive assessment of the electrical energy production pro- cess. For example, the duration of interruption in PVP power generation, due to continuous cloudiness, is ex- pected in August for at least three consecutive days (fig. 4). In January, this interval is at least eight days in a row. Since the maximum value of daily electricity production in August is almost three times greater than in January (fig. 5), it can be assumed that the minimum capacity of the PVP electric- ity storage must exceed, at least three times, the largest daily generation volume in the annual time interval. It is possible to use pumped hydro energy storage on land [45], sea [46], or underground [47] to store the energy of a large PVP. However, it is worth noting that determining the amount of energy storage in each specific project requires comprehensive consideration of water storage, monitoring and control systems, operating modes, and equipment costs to achieve competitive technical and economic per- formance indicators of the facility [48]. Conclusions 1. The process of energy generation by a photovoltaic plant is represented by a set of daily random functions. Algo- rithms have been developed for calculating expected trends and their stochastic components, normalized corre- lation functions, probabilistic assurance of different levels of power and volumes of electrical energy production. Cal- culation studies were performed for a hypothetical power plant with installed capacity of photovoltaic modules of 1 kW that allows further scaling of the results to arbitrary power. To obtain statistically stable estimates, a 16-year time interval from 2005 to 2020 was studied. As the source of information, meteorological database SARAH2 was used, containing hourly information on the density of solar irra- diance, ambient temperature, and wind speed in the mid- dle part of the Azov-Black Sea region of Ukraine. The ob- tained quantitative results can be used for feasibility studies of the integration of PVP energy into the technolog- ical schemes of water desalination in this region. The re- sults can be further specified at the stage of operational de- sign by applying specific input data and using specialized commercial software. 2. In the most advantageous hours of the summer period, the maximum value of the power trend reaches the level of (0.60-0.64) kW, and the corresponding average daily power value is 0.4 kW. Algorithms have been developed for calcu- lating the probability of exceeding the various required lev- els of the power and volumes of electricity production by the PVP in each month and each hour. In particular, at noon (12:00 a.m.), power generation of more than 0.4 kW will be observed: in August – 28 days, in April – 22 days, in October – 18 days, in January – 7 days. In the morning, at 9:00 a.m., the duration of generation of the average daily power value of more than 0.4 kW can be expected: in August – 18 days, in April – 15 days, in October – 11 days, in January – 0 days. In August, the interruption of PVP’s power generation, caused by continuous cloudiness, is expected for at least 3 consecutive days. For the months of the autumn-winter pe- riod, the interruption of generation, due to continuous cloudiness, can be observed for more than a week. 3. Statistical estimates of the PVP’s expected daily, monthly and annual volumes of electricity production were ob- tained taking into account the meteorological conditions of the region. The achievable annual value of the capacity fac- tor of the PVP, provided that the generated energy is fully integrated into the technological schemes of water desali- nation, can be expected in the range of (0.128 – 0.148) p.u. In the winter period, the process of electricity generation demonstrates significant variability. The value of standard deviation reaches the level of the average value, which is caused by the presence of cloudiness in this period of time. The volume of electricity production in the winter months is almost three times smaller than in the summer months. In particular, the average value of the daily amount of elec- tricity produced by the hypothetical PVP in August is about 4.8 kW∙h/day, and in January – only 1.4 kW∙h/day. It is determined that the minimal capacity of the PVP stor- age system, required for the stable and uninterruptible power supply of the desalination facility, must be at least three times as big as the maximum daily volume of energy production of the plant evaluated in the yearly time inter- val. The signs of climatic cyclicity in the amount of electricity production with a duration of (3-5) years were detected. 4. Successful integration of PVP electricity into technologi- cal schemes of water desalination requires detailed tech- nical and economic optimization of the entire technological complex composed of the desalination facility, power plant, energy and water storages, monitoring and control system, as well as the cost of equipment, to achieve com- petitive technical and economic performance indicators. REFERENCES 1. Ad van Wijk, Jorgo Chatzimarkakisr. Green Hydrogen for a European Green Deal A 2x40 GW Initiative. Brussels: Hydrogen Europe. 40 p. 2. Memorandum of Understanding between the European Union and Ukraine on a Strategic Partnership on Bio- methane, Hydrogen and other Synthetic Gases. 02.02.2023. P. 8. – https://energy.ec.europa.eu/ mem- orandum-understanding-between-european-union- and-ukraine-strategic-partnership-biomethane_en [Ac- cessed – March.04.2024]. 3. Philip Woods, Heriberto Bustamante, Kondo-Francois Aguey-Zinsou. The hydrogen economy – Where is the water? Energy Nexus. Vol. 7. September 2022. 100123. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/ 115 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100123 [Ac- cessed – March.04.2024]. 4. [National report on the quality of drinking water and the state of drinking water supply and drainage in Ukraine in 2022]. Ministry of Development of Communities, Ter- ritories and Infrastructure of Ukraine. Kyiv, 2023. 397 p. (Ukr.) 5. Khorolskyi A. O., Lapko V. V., Salli S., Mamaikin O. R. [The choice of wastewater demineralization technology as a component of the technological flows of coal mines]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NHU [Collection of sci- entific works of NMU]. 2020. № 63. Pp. 61–73. (Ukr.) – https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/63.061 [Accessed – March.04.2024]. 6. Salieiev I. A. [Desalination of mine waters during mine closure mine named after N. I. Stashkov of the private joint-stock company "Donbas fuel and energy company Pavlograd coal”]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NHU [Collec- tion of scientific works of NMU]. 2021. № 66. Pp. 81– 93. (Ukr.) –https://doi.org/10.33271/crpnmu/66.081 [Accessed – March.04.2024]. 7. Yelatontsev D. O., Mukhachev A. P. [Prospects for ob- taining desalinated water from coal mine waters with the simultaneous utilization of mine methane]. Materi- aly VII Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Chysta voda. Fundamentalni,prykladni ta promyslovi aspekty» (25-26 lystopada 2021 r., m. Kyiv, Ukraina) [Materials of the VII International Scientific and Practi- cal Conference "Clean Water. Fundamental, applied and industrial aspects" (November 25-26, 2021, Kyiv, Ukraine)]. Kyiv: Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut im. Ihoria Sikorskoho, 2021. Pp. 124–126. (Ukr.) – https://ela.kpi.ua/bit- stream/123456789/46891/1/Pure_water_2021-124- 126.pdf [Accessed – March.04.2024]. 8. Kulikova D. V. Development of a resource-saving tech- nology for integrated processing of highly mineralized mine water in the enterprises of the Kryvyi Rih iron ore basin. Ekolohichni nauky [Environmental Sciences]. 2022. No 5(44). Pp. 158–162. – https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2022.eco.5-44.23 [Accessed – March.04.2024]. 9. Hisham T. El-Dessouky, Hisham M. Ettouney. Fundamen- tals of Salt Water Desalination, Elsevier, 2002. 670 p. 10. Bryk M. T. [Drinking water and membrane technologies (overview)]. NaUKMA: Naukovi zapysky. T. 18. Khimichni nauky [Chemical sciences]. 2000. Pp. 4–24. (Ukr.) 11. Curto D.; Franzitta V.; Guercio A. A Review of the Water Desalination Technologies. Applied Sciences. 2021. 11(2). 670. – https://doi.org/ 10.3390/app11020670 [Accessed – March.04.2024]. 12. Karagiannis I. C.; Soldatos P. G. Water desalination cost literature: Review and assessment. Desalination. 2008. 223(1-3). Pp. 448–456. 13. Water Desalination Using Renewable Energy. Technol- ogy Brief. IEA-ETSAP and IRENA. Technology Brief I12 – March 2012. – https://www.irena.org/-/me- dia/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2012/IRENA- ETSAP-Tech-Brief-I12-Water-Desalination.pdf [Ac- cessed – March.04.2024]. 14. Lienhard John H.; Thiel Gregory P.; Warsinger David M., Banchik Leonardo D. Low Carbon Desalination: Status and Research, Development, and Demonstration Needs. Report of a workshop conducted at the Massa- chusetts Institute of Technology in association with the Global Clean Water Desalination Alliance. Mit Abdul Latif Jameel World Water and Food Security Lab. Cam- bridge, Massachusetts, November 2016. – https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/105755 [Accessed – March.04.2024]. 15. Bundschuh J., Kaczmarczyk M., Ghaffour N., To- maszewska B. State-of-the-art of renewable energy sources used in water desalination: Present and future prospects. Desalination. 508. 15 July 2021. 115035. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115035 [Accessed – March.04.2024]. 16. [Atlas of the energy potential of renewable energy sources of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Interservis, 2020. 82 p. (Ukr.) 17. https://solarsystem.com.ua/ru/solar-system-rating/ [Accessed – March.07.2024]. 18. Haievskyi O. Yu. [Photoenergy. Part I. Solar radiation and photovoltaic modules: a textbook]. ]. Kyiv: Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut im. Ihoria Sikorskoho, 2023. 150 p. (Ukr.) – https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/58361 [Accessed – March.07.2024]. 19. Ghafoor A., Ahmed T., Munir A., Arslan Ch., Ahmad S. A. Techno-economic feasibility of solar based desalination through reverse osmosis. Desalination. Vol. 485. 1 July 2020. 114464. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.de- sal.2020.114464 [Accessed – March.14.2024]. 20. Ahmed M. Ghaithan, Awsan Mohammed, Laith Hadidi. Assessment of integrating solar energy with reverse os- mosis desalination. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. Vol. 53. Part C. October 2022. 102740. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102740 [Accessed – March.14.2024]. 21. Abderrahim Maftouh, Omkaltoume El Fatni, Siham Bouzekri. Economic Feasibility of Solar-Powered Re- verse Osmosis Water Desalination: A Comparative Sys- temic Review. Research Square. July 1st 2022. 30 p. – https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1674547/v1 [Accessed – March.14.2024]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100123 https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/46891/1/Pure_water_2021-124-126.pdf https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/46891/1/Pure_water_2021-124-126.pdf https://ela.kpi.ua/bitstream/123456789/46891/1/Pure_water_2021-124-126.pdf https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2012/IRENA-ETSAP-Tech-Brief-I12-Water-Desalination.pdf https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2012/IRENA-ETSAP-Tech-Brief-I12-Water-Desalination.pdf https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2012/IRENA-ETSAP-Tech-Brief-I12-Water-Desalination.pdf https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/105755 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115035 https://solarsystem.com.ua/ru/solar-system-rating/ https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/58361 https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/desalination https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114464 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2020.114464 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138822007883 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138822007883 https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1674547/v1 116 Відновлювана енергетика. №2/2024 | Гідро-воднева енергетика 22. Kovalenko Y. N., Kuznetsov N. Iu., Shurenkov V. M. [Ran- dom processes: reference book]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1983. 368 p. (Rus.) 23. Skorokhod A. V. [Lectures on the theory of random pro- cesses]. Kyiv: Lybid, 1990. 168 p. (Ukr.) 24. Ramon van Handel. Probability and Random Processes. ORF309/MAT380. Lecture Notes Princeton University Thisversion: February 22, 2016. 195 p. 25. Julius S. Bendat, Allan G. Piersol. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. 4th Edition. Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010. 640 p. ISBN: 978-0-470-24877-5. 26. Kobzar A. I. [Applied mathematical statistics. For engi- neers and scientists]. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2012. 816 с. IBSN 5-9221-0707-0. (Rus.) 27. Kotsiubynskyi V. O. [Applied statistics]. Ivano-Frankivsk: Prykarpatskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. Vasylia Stef- anyka, 2019. 269 p. (Ukr.) 28. Volodarskyi Ye. T., Koshova L. O. [Theory and practice of experimental research]. Kyiv: Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut im. Ihoria Sikorskoho, 2023. 299 p. (Ukr.) 29. Duffie J. A., Beckman W. A. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Inc., 2013. 910 p. 30. Kalogirou S. A. Solar Energy Engineering. Processes and Systems. Second Edition. Elsevier Inc., 2014. 819 p. 31. DSTU 7503:2014 [Solar energy. Photoelectric stations. Terms and definitions]. Kyiv: Ministry of Economic De- velopment of Ukraine. 2014. 41 p. (Ukr.) 32. Kolontaievskyi Yu. P., Tuhai D. V., Kotelevets S. V. [Pho- toenergy]. Kharkiv: KhNUUE im. O. M. Beketova, 2019. 160 с. (Ukr.) 33. Kim J.; Rabelo M.; Padi S. P.; Yousuf H.; Cho E.-C.; Yi J. A Review of the Degradation of Photovoltaic Modules for Life Expectancy. Energies. 2021. 14(14). 4278. – https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144278 [Accessed – March.14.2024]. 34. Rahman T., Mansur A. A., Hossain Lipu M. S., Rah- man M. S., Ashique R. H., Houran M. A., Elavarasan R. M., Hossain E. Investigation of Degradation of Solar Photovol- taics: A Review of Aging Factors, Impacts, and Future Di- rections toward Sustainable Energy Management. Ener- gies. 2023. 16(9). 3706. – https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093706 [Accessed – March.14.2024]. 35. https://www.powermag.com/analysis-of-perfor- mance-degradation-of-pv-modules/#:~:text=A%20typi- cal%20 PV%20module%20is, %2Dinduced%20degrada- tion%20(LID) [Accessed – March.14.2024]. 36. Andriievskyi S. M., Klymyshyn I. A. [General astronomy course]. Odesa: Astroprynt, 2007. 480 p. (Ukr.) 37. Daniel S. Wilks. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. Second Edition. Elsevier, 2006. 649 p. 38. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/photovol- taic-geographical-information-system-pvgis_en 39. PVSYST Photovoltaic software. (2023). A full package for the study of your photovoltaic systems. – https://www.pvsyst.com [Accessed – December.10.2023]. 40. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System. (2023). Interactive tools. – https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu [Ac- cessed – December.10.2023] 41. Prusov V. A., Snizhko S. I. [Methods of applied system analysis in hydrometeorology: a textbook]. Kyiv: Print Servis, 2017. 701 p. (Ukr.) 42. https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/#api_5.2 [Ac- cessed – December.03.2023] 43. Wayne A. Fuller. Introduction to Statistical Time Series. Second Edition. Wiley Series in Probability and Statis- tics. 2009. 728 p. 44. Vasko P. F., Mazurenko I. L. [Express analysis of proba- bilistic characteristics of wind power stations as a source of energy for seawater desalination in the Azov- Black Sea region of Ukraine]. Enerhotekhnolohii ta resursozberezhennia [Energy Technologies & Resource Saving]. 2023. No. 4. Pp. 42−56. (Ukr.) DOI: 10.33070/etars.4.2023.04 45. Vasko P. F., Verbovyi A. P., Ibrahimova M. R., Pazych S. T. [Hydro-storage power plants are the technological basis for integrating powerful wind and solar power plants into the electricity system of Ukraine]. Hi- droenerhetyka Ukrainy [Hydropower of Ukraine]. 2017. No. 1-2. Pp. 20–25. (Ukr.) 46. Concept of Accumulation of Energy from Photovoltaic and Wind Power Plants by Means of Seawater Pumped Hydroelectric Energy Storage/ P. Vasko, A. Verbovij, A. Moroz, S. Pazych, M. Ibragimova, L. Sahno. 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Energy Smart Systems (2019 IEEE ESS). April 17-19. 2019. Kyiv. Ukraine. Pp. 188–191. DOI: 10.1109/ESS.2019.8764167 47. Morabito A. Underground cavities in pumped hydro en- ergy storage and other alternate solutions. Encyclope- dia of Energy Storage. 2022. Pp. 193–204. – https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819723-3.00145-1 [Accessed – March.24.2024]. 48. Azinheira G, Segurado R, Costa M. Is Renewable Energy- Powered Desalination a Viable Solution for Water Stressed Regions? A Case Study in Algarve, Portugal. En- ergies. 2019. 12(24). 4651. – https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244651 [Accessed – March.24.2024]. https://www.wiley.com/en-be/search?filters%5Bauthor%5D=Julius+S.+Bendat&pq=++ https://www.wiley.com/en-be/search?filters%5Bauthor%5D=Allan+G.+Piersol&pq=++ https://doi.org/10.3390/en14144278 https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093706 https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/#api_5.2 https://www.wiley.com/en-ie/search?filters%5Bauthor%5D=Wayne+A.+Fuller&pq=++ https://www.wiley.com/en-ie/Wiley+Series+in+Probability+and+Statistics-c-1345 https://www.wiley.com/en-ie/Wiley+Series+in+Probability+and+Statistics-c-1345 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819723-3.00145-1 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244651
id veorgua-article-461
institution Vidnovluvana energetika
keywords_txt_mv keywords
language Ukrainian
last_indexed 2026-07-19T01:13:32Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Institute of Renewable Energy National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
record_format ojs
resource_txt_mv veorgua/17/bae6194569199ccf5ba3661f39f21317.pdf
spelling veorgua-article-4612026-07-18T06:32:20Z STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE СТАТИСТИЧНА ОЦІНКА ПОКАЗНИКІВ ФУНКЦІОНУВАННЯ ФОТОЕЛЕКТРИЧНИХ СТАНЦІЙ ЯК ДЖЕРЕЛА ЕНЕРГІЇ ДЛЯ ОПРІСНЕННЯ ВОДИ В АЗОВО-ЧОРНОМОРСЬКОМУ РЕГІОНІ УКРАЇНИ Vasko, P. Mazurenko, I. Sysak , R. random function, electricity, probability, power, solar irradiance, statistics, photovoltaic plant. випадкова функція, електроенергія, імовірність, потужність, сонячне випромінювання, статис-тика, фотоелектрична станція. The application of statistical methods for the analysis of random processes to obtain quantitative estimates for the performance indicators of photovoltaic plants as a stochastic energy source is considered. The power generation process is represented by a set of daily random functions with their respective trends and stochastic components. One hour was taken as the minimum stationari-ty interval of trend’s statistical characteristics. A time period of 16 years was studied to obtain statistically stable estimates. The meteorological database SARAH2 was used as a source of hourly data on the density of solar irradiance, ambient temperature and wind speed in the middle part of the Azov-Black Sea region of Ukraine. For mathematical modelling of power generation and electricity production processes, specialized software PVGIS version 5.2 of the European Commission was used. Hourly quantitative estimates of expected daily power generation trends for each month of the year, as well as their correlation functions, were computed. Algorithms were developed and levels of probabilistic assurance for hourly generated power were evaluated. Statistical estimates of the expected daily, monthly, and annual volumes of electricity production by photovoltaic power plants were studied, taking into account the meteorological conditions in the said region. Розглянуто застосування статистичних методів аналізу випадкових процесів для отримання кількісних оцінок показників функціонування фотоелектричних станцій як стохастичного джерела енергії. Процес генерування електроенергії представлено сукупністю щоденних випадкових функцій зі своїм трендом та стохастичною складовою. За мінімальний інтервал стаціонарності статистичних характеристик тренду приймалась одна година. Досліджувався період часу тривалістю 16 років для отримання статистично стійких оцінок. Використовувалась метеорологічна база даних SARAH2 з погодинною інформацією про щільність сонячного випромінювання, температуру навколишнього середовища та швидкість вітру в середній частині Азово-Чорноморського регіону України. Для математичного моделювання процесів генерування потужності та виробництва електроенергії застосовувалось спеціалізоване програмне забезпе-чення PVGIS версії 5.2 Європейської Комісії. Отримано очікувані погодинні кількісні оцінки параметрів щоденних трендів генерування потужності для кожного місяця року та їх кореляційні функції. Розроблено алгоритми та визначено ймовір-нісні рівні забезпеченості щогодинної генерованої потужності. Досліджено статистичні оцінки очікуваних денних, місячних та річних обсягів виробництва електроенергії фотоелектростанціями з урахуванням метеорологічних умов регіону. Бібл. 48, табл. 2, рис. 8. Institute of Renewable Energy National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2024-07-01 Article Article application/pdf https://ve.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/461 10.36296/1819-8058.2024.2(77).105-116 Vidnovluvana energetika ; No. 2(77) (2024): Scientific and applied Journal renewable energy ; 105-116 Возобновляемая энергетика; ##issue.no## 2(77) (2024): Scientific and applied Journal renewable energy ; 105-116 Відновлювана енергетика; № 2(77) (2024): Науково-прикладний журнал Відновлювана енергетика; 105-116 2664-8172 1819-8058 10.36296/1819-8058.2024.2(77) uk https://ve.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/461/370 Copyright (c) 2024 P. Vasko, I. Mazurenko, R. Sysak https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle random function
electricity
probability
power
solar irradiance
statistics
photovoltaic plant.
Vasko, P.
Mazurenko, I.
Sysak , R.
STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE
title STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE
title_alt СТАТИСТИЧНА ОЦІНКА ПОКАЗНИКІВ ФУНКЦІОНУВАННЯ ФОТОЕЛЕКТРИЧНИХ СТАНЦІЙ ЯК ДЖЕРЕЛА ЕНЕРГІЇ ДЛЯ ОПРІСНЕННЯ ВОДИ В АЗОВО-ЧОРНОМОРСЬКОМУ РЕГІОНІ УКРАЇНИ
title_full STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE
title_fullStr STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE
title_full_unstemmed STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE
title_short STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PLANTS AS A SOURCE OF ENERGY FOR WATER DESALINATION IN THE AZOV-BLACK SEA REGION OF UKRAINE
title_sort statistical evaluation of performance indicators of photovoltaic plants as a source of energy for water desalination in the azov-black sea region of ukraine
topic random function
electricity
probability
power
solar irradiance
statistics
photovoltaic plant.
topic_facet random function
electricity
probability
power
solar irradiance
statistics
photovoltaic plant.
випадкова функція
електроенергія
імовірність
потужність
сонячне випромінювання
статис-тика
фотоелектрична станція.
url https://ve.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/461
work_keys_str_mv AT vaskop statisticalevaluationofperformanceindicatorsofphotovoltaicplantsasasourceofenergyforwaterdesalinationintheazovblacksearegionofukraine
AT mazurenkoi statisticalevaluationofperformanceindicatorsofphotovoltaicplantsasasourceofenergyforwaterdesalinationintheazovblacksearegionofukraine
AT sysakr statisticalevaluationofperformanceindicatorsofphotovoltaicplantsasasourceofenergyforwaterdesalinationintheazovblacksearegionofukraine
AT vaskop statističnaocínkapokaznikívfunkcíonuvannâfotoelektričnihstancíjâkdžerelaenergíídlâoprísnennâvodivazovočornomorsʹkomuregíoníukraíni
AT mazurenkoi statističnaocínkapokaznikívfunkcíonuvannâfotoelektričnihstancíjâkdžerelaenergíídlâoprísnennâvodivazovočornomorsʹkomuregíoníukraíni
AT sysakr statističnaocínkapokaznikívfunkcíonuvannâfotoelektričnihstancíjâkdžerelaenergíídlâoprísnennâvodivazovočornomorsʹkomuregíoníukraíni