ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ
Gespeichert in:
| Datum: | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
ДКС Центр
2026
|
| Online Zugang: | https://www.nayka.com.ua/index.php/agrosvit/article/view/10331 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Назва журналу: | Agrosvit |
| Завантажити файл: |  |
Institution
Agrosvit| _version_ | 1867479145064169472 |
|---|---|
| author | Нагорна, О. В. Сальнікова, А. В. Іллєнко, В. В. Нагорний, В. В. |
| author_facet | Нагорна, О. В. Сальнікова, А. В. Іллєнко, В. В. Нагорний, В. В. |
| author_institution_txt_mv | [
{
"author": "О. В. Нагорна",
"institution": null
},
{
"author": "А. В. Сальнікова",
"institution": null
},
{
"author": "В. В. Іллєнко",
"institution": null
},
{
"author": "В. В. Нагорний",
"institution": null
}
] |
| author_sort | Нагорна, О. В. |
| baseUrl_str | https://www.nayka.com.ua/index.php/agrosvit/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2026-06-08T08:39:19Z |
| doi_str_mv | 10.32702/2306-6792.2026.10.301 |
| first_indexed | 2026-06-09T01:01:37Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
АГРОСВІТ № 10, 2026
301
ISSN 2306-6792 Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
УДК 332.3:502.131.1(477)005.591:658.8
O. Nahorna,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Marketing
and International Trade, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-0874
A. Salnikova,
PhD in Ecology, Associate Professor of the Department of General Ecology, Radiobiology and
Life Safety, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6706-2140
V. Illienko,
PhD in Biology, associate professor of Department of General Ecology, Radiobiology and Life
Safety, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-0442
V. Nahornyi,
PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economics,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-4779
ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC VALUATION
OF LAND IN DE-OCCUPIED TERRITORIES
DOI: 10.32702/2306-6792.2026.10.301
О. В. Нагорна,
к. е. н., доцент, доцент кафедри маркетингу та міжнародної торгівлі,
Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України
А. В. Сальнікова,
к. с.-г. н., доцент, доцент кафедри загальної екології, радіобіології та безпеки життєдіяльності,
Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України
В. В. Іллєнко,
к. б. н., доцент, доцент кафедри загальної екології, радіобіології та безпеки життєдіяльності,
Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України
В. В. Нагорний,
к. е. н., доцент, доцент кафедри економіки, Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України
ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ
Modern challenges associated with the restoration of de-occupied territories necessitate a comprehensive assessment
of land resources, accounting for both economic and environmental factors. Therefore, this study aims to develop
methodological approaches for the valuation of lands that have been subjected to anthropogenic and technogenic pressure
as a result of military actions. During the study, an approach to assessing land in de-occupied territories is proposed: it is
based on a comprehensive ecological and economic framework and makes it possible to overcome the limitations of
traditional market-based land valuation. In particular, it makes it possible to overcome the limitations of traditional
market-based land valuation methods. The formulated provisions demonstrate that, unlike classical approaches that
primarily consider current market conditions, the proposed model integrates both economic and environmental
parameters of land use functioning. In particular, land value in de-occupied territories is formed both as a market category
and owing to the effect of soil degradation processes, technogenic and chemical pollution, physical damage to land
(including mine contamination), loss of productive potential, and the need for substantial restoration investments. In
light of this, valuation acquires an ecological and economic nature, as it combines: an economic component (market
value, income-generating potential), an environmental component (soil quality, pollution, degree of degradation), and a
302
АГРОСВІТ № 10, 2026
ISSN 2306-6792Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Modern challenges associated with the
restoration of de-occupied territories create the
need for a comprehensive assessment of land
resources, taking into account both economic and
environmental factors. This stems from land
affected by military actions is characterized by
disruption of soil cover, contamination, degra-
dation processes, and loss of productive potential.
Specifically, in the de-occupied territories of
southern and eastern Ukraine, significant areas of
agricultural land have been affected by landmines,
crater formation from explosions, various forms
of chemical contamination, and remnants of
ammunition. As a result, even after demining, such
areas require additional agrochemical analysis,
reclamation, and restoration of soil fertility.
In this situation, classical approaches to land
valuation prove to be insufficient. They do not
adequately account for a wide range of environ-
mental risks, including chemical contamination of
soils with heavy metals (lead, cadmium, mercury),
restoration component (costs of reclamation, demining, and remediation). Usefulness of the approach to the ecological
and economic valuation of land in de-occupied territories lies in the fact that it enables: obtaining a realistic rather than
overestimated market value of land; accounting for hidden losses and future costs that are ignored in classical models;
forming a substantiated basis for investment decisions, state compensation policies, and territorial recovery programs;
ensuring alignment of economic decisions with environmental safety; increasing the reliability of valuation under
conditions of high uncertainty and risk.
Сучасні виклики, пов'язані з відновленням деокупованих територій, формують необхідність комплексної оцінки
земельних ресурсів з урахуванням як економічних, так і екологічних чинників. Відтак метою дослідження є форму-
вання методичних підходів до оцінки земель, які зазнали антропогенного та техногенного навантаження внаслідок
активних військових дій. У межах дослідження запропоновано такий підхід до оцінки земельних угідь на деокупова-
них територіях, що грунтується на комплексному еколого-економічному характері та дозволяє подолати обмеженість
традиційної ринкової оцінки земельних ресурсів. Сформовані положення доводять, що на відміну від класичних
підходів, які враховують поточну ринкову кон'юнктуру, запропонована система показників інтегрує як економічні,
так і екологічні параметри функціонування земельних угідь. Зокрема, йдеться про те, що вартість земель на деокупо-
ваних територіях формується не лише як ринкова категорія, але і як результат впливу: деградаційних процесів грунтів,
техногенного та хімічного забруднення, фізичного пошкодження земель (у тому числі від мінування), втрати їх про-
дуктивного потенціалу та пов'язаної з цим необхідності здійснення значних відновлювальних інвестицій. У цьому
контексті оцінка набуває комплексної природи, зокрема поєднує: економічну складову (ринкова вартість, дохідний
потенціал), екологічну складову (якість грунтів, рівень забруднення, ступінь деградації), відновлювальну складову
(витрати на рекультивацію, розмінування, очищення). Практична цінність запропонованого підходу до еколого-еко-
номічної оцінки земельних угідь на деокупованих територіях в тому, що він дозволяє: отримати реалістичну, а не
завищену ринкову вартість земель; врахувати приховані втрати та майбутні витрати (які ігноруються у класичних
моделях); сформувати обгрунтовану базу для інвестиційних рішень, державної компенсаційної політики та програм
відновлення територій; забезпечити узгодження економічних рішень із екологічною безпекою; підвищити дос-
товірність оцінки в умовах високої невизначеності та ризиків.
Key words: assessment of land resources; economic factors; environmental factors; productive
potential; restorative investments; degradation processes; soils; technogenic and chemical pollution;
physical damage to land.
Ключові слова: оцінка земельних ресурсів; економічні чинники; екологічні чинники; про-
дуктивний потенціал; відновлювальні інвестиції; деградаційні процеси; грунти; техногенне
та хімічне забруднення; фізичне пошкодження земель.
petroleum products, and toxic residues of
explosive substances; degradation of soil structure
and erosion processes; risks of secondary
contamination of groundwater and surface water;
loss of biodiversity; and the deterioration of
ecosystem functions of land resources.
Notably, according to instrumental and
laboratory studies conducted by specialists of the
Center of Excellence for Mine Action and
Environmental Security, elevated concentrations
of heavy metals (arsenic, lead, copper, zinc) and
explosive residues have been detected in soils in
the de-occupied areas of the Mykolaiv region [3].
Moreover, certain plots have suffered significant
damage to the soil cover and disruption of its
natural state, which will require substantial efforts
for reclamation.
In this setting, comprehensive environmental
assessment serves as a basis for determining the cost
of land restoration, assessing losses, and developing
effective policies for the rational use of land
resources.
АГРОСВІТ № 10, 2026
303
ISSN 2306-6792 Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES
AND ISSUES ANALYSIS
Certain issues related to the ecological and
economic assessment of land resources in Ukraine
are addressed in the works of Kalinchyk M.,
Slobodyanyk A., Taranenko P., Nastopyrov V. [1],
Levandivskyi O.T., Balaniuk I.F., Shelenko D.I.,
Sas L.S. [4], and Koshkalda I.V., Anopriienko
T.V. [2]. Concurrently, existing studies highlight
the features of optimizing valuation methods, as
well as modern strategies and innovative
solutions in the field of land valuation. However,
the ecological and economic aspects of land
valuation in de-occupied territories have not
been sufficiently addressed in the scientific
literature.
The principal reason for the limited coverage
of ecological and economic issues of land valuation
in de-occupied territories in the scientific litera-
ture is the novelty of the research object itself,
which has emerged as a result of full-scale military
actions, as well as the lack of adequate attention
to this issue at the legislative level (the most recent
methodology is provided in the Resolution of the
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine "On Approval of
the Methodology for Normative Monetary
Valuation of Land Plots" dated November 3, 2021,
№ 1147 [1]).
The vast majority of scientific approaches to
land valuation in Ukraine were developed under
conditions of relative stability and were focused
on traditional value-determining factors, without
taking into account large-scale military and tech-
nogenic impacts.
RESEARCH AIM
Thus, this study aims is to develop methodo-
logical approaches for the assessment of land
that has been subjected to anthropogenic and
technogenic impacts as a result of military
actions.
MAIN FINDINGS
OF THE RESEARCH
Within the scope of the present study, the
authors emphasize that the ecological and
economic assessment of land resources in terri-
tories liberated from russian occupation after Feb-
ruary 24, 2022, should be regarded as a com-
prehensive process of determining land value and
economic utility, given both productive potential
and their environmental condition, degree of
degradation, contamination levels, risks of further
use, and the necessary costs of restoration.
This is shaped by the specific characteristics of
land in de-occupied territories identified by
experts of the NGO "Ecology Center of Environ-
mental Initiatives 'Ecoaction'" together with
domain experts [7], namely:
1. Physical disturbance of the land surface,
evidenced by the presence of craters and depre-
ssions (triggered by air strikes and artillery bom-
bardment), trenches, fortification structures, soil
compaction resulting from the movement of
military equipment and troops, construction of
defensive structures, and areas of explosive distur-
bance.
2. Mine and explosive contamination, cha-
racterized by the presence of unexploded or-
dnance, which restricts or completely prevents
land use.
3. Chemical contamination of soils, associated
with the presence of heavy metals, petroleum pro-
ducts, residues of explosive substances, and other
toxicants.
4. Varying degrees of soil degradation, mani-
fested in the disruption of soil structure, reduced
fertility, erosion processes, and loss of the humus
layer.
5. Disturbance of the water regime, ex-
pressed through altered hydrological conditions
and deterioration of surface and groundwater
quality.
6. Loss or reduction of biodiversity, resulting
from the destruction of natural ecosystems and a
decrease in flora and fauna populations.
7. Reduction or loss of productive potential,
due to temporary or long-term unsuitability of
land for agricultural use.
Every identified characteristic has direct
negative consequences. For example, disrup-
tion of the soil water balance leads to the de-
velopment of wind and water erosion. Physical
disturbance of land cover results in the destruc-
tion of the humus horizon, the loss of the soil's
physicochemical properties, and changes in its
granulometric composition and aggregate
structure [7]. Chemical contamination of soils
alters the natural physicochemical parameters
of the soil cover (pH, cation exchange capa-
city, and humus content) [7]. The concen-
tration of toxic chemical substances forms
various local landscape-geochemical anoma-
lies.
All these factors affect soil fertility and
water retention capacity [7], and in some cases
influence the cost of land use and its suitability
for long-term utilization. In fact, taken to-
gether, these characteristics create a need for
significant restoration measures and, conse-
quently, affect the environmental and economic
assessment of land resources in de-occupied
304
АГРОСВІТ № 10, 2026
ISSN 2306-6792Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
territories.Further evidence is provided by the
data presented in Table 1.
Environmental diagnostics of land in de-
occupied territories is an integrated evaluation of
the condition and degree of land degradation. It
should combine various ecological characteristics,
including the degree of soil disturbance, the level
of toxic contamination, and the loss of ecosystem
functions
Factually, we consider it appropriate to
group the indicators of environmental assessment
of land resources into three main blocks: indi-
cators of the physical condition of soils, indicators
of chemical and technogenic contamination, and
indicators of the ecosystem state of land. In
particular [3; 5; 7]:
1. The block of indicators of the physical
condition of soils should characterize the
degree of mechanical disturbance of land as a
result of military actions. It is recommended to
include: (i) the level of soil cover disturbance
(area and depth of craters, trenches, and pits);
( i i) the degree of so il compact ion; ( i i i)
disruption of the soil profile structure; (iv) the
intensity of erosion processes (active water and
wind erosion).
2. The block of indicators of chemical and
technogenic contamination should reflect the
level of land hazard for further use. It is re-
commended to include: (i) heavy metal content;
(ii) level of petroleum product contamination;
(iii) presence of explosive residues, mine and
explosive contamination; (iv) exceedance of
maximum permissible concentrations of toxic
substances.
3. The block of indicators of ecosystem state
of land characterizes the functional capacity of
land resources as natural systems: (i) humus
content and soil fertility indicators; (ii) water
regime conditions (quality and availability of water
resources); (iii) level of biodiversity; (iv) degree of
preservation of ecosystem functions (self-
regulation, resilience); (v) level of degradation of
natural components.
Such grouping makes it possible to syste-
matically assess the environmental condition of
land resources in de-occupied territories and
provides a basis for defining a system of indi-
Land assessment
Restoration measures in affected
territories
Impact
on land assessment
Physical disturbance
of land cover
(craters, trenches,
soil compaction)
Land-use planning, filling of
craters, deep loosening (deep
ripping), land reclamation, and
terrain restoration
Decrease in value due to
loss of productivity and
additional restoration
costs
Mine and explosive
contamination
Demining, technical inspection of
territories, and marking of
hazardous areas
Critical decline in value
or temporary loss of the
land’s economic worth
Chemical
contamination of
soils
Agrochemical analysis, soil
decontamination,
phytoremediation, application of
sorbents, and topsoil replacement
Reduction in value due to
environmental risks and
substantial remediation
costs
Soil degradation
(erosion, loss of
humus, structural
deterioration)
Agro-reclamation measures,
application of organic and mineral
fertilizers, restoration of the
humus layer, and anti-erosion
measures
Decrease in rental income
and long-term reduction
in economic efficiency
Disturbance of the
water regime
Restoration of drainage systems,
land reclamation, purification of
water resources, and regulation of
the hydrological regime
Restrictions on land use
and reduced investment
attractiveness
Loss of biodiversity Biological reclamation, restoration
of natural ecosystems,
afforestation, and grassing
(conversion to grassland)
Decline in ecosystem
value and potential for
sustainable use
Reduction or loss of
productive potential
Comprehensive reclamation,
implementation of adaptive
agricultural technologies, and land
conservation (where necessary)
Direct reduction in
economic valuation and
the need to account for
the recovery period
Table 1. Interrelationships among land characteristics, restoration measures,
and their influence on the environmental and economic assessment
of land resources in de-occupied territories.
Source: compiled based on [7; 3; 1].
АГРОСВІТ № 10, 2026
305
ISSN 2306-6792 Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
cators and algorithms aimed at the qualitative
aggregation of detailed information on the
environmental state of land resources (see Table
2).
Such an assessment should be aimed at
substantiating managerial decisions regarding the
restoration and rational use of land resources in
the post-war period. Therefore, for further
formalization, it is appropriate to use:
1. Normalization of the indicators defined in
Table 2:
min
max
min
norm X
X
X
X=K −− (1),
where: K(norm) — normalized value of the
indicator; X — actual value of the indicator; X(min) —
minimum value of the indicator in the sample; X(max) —
maximum value of the indicator in the sample.
Assessment
block
System of indicators
Units of
measure
Algorithm (methodology) of calculation
Soil cover
disturbance level
% of area
( ) 100/₁ ×StotalSaffected=K ,
where: S(total, affected) – total area of
disturbed land (affected land area)
Depth of
disturbances (craters,
trenches)
m
Weighted average value based on field
measurements
Soil compaction
degree
g/cm³ optimalρ!ρ=K /2 ,
де ρ – soil density
Soil structure
disruption
points /
index
Expert assessment or share of disturbed
horizons (%)
Physical
condition of
soils
(It is important
to determine
the soil
buffering
capacity for
recovery,
humus loss,
and reduction
of natural
fertility). Intensity of erosion
processes
t/ha/year
Calculation based on erosion models (e.g.,
USLE) or field data
Heavy metal content
(lead, cadmium,
mercury, etc.)
mg/kg
MPC!C=K /3 ,
where: С(fact) – actual concentration of the
pollutant in soil; MPC – maximum permissible
concentration of the respective substance.
Petroleum product
contamination
mg/kg
Comparison of actual content with regulatory
standards
Explosive residue
content
mg/kg /
presence
(binary
indicator)
Laboratory analysis or binary assessment (0/1)
Level of mine
contamination risk
% of area /
index
K 4=
S
неб
S
заг
where: S(haz) – area of hazardous land
(contaminated with explosive ordnance);
S(tot) — total area of the study territory.
Chemical and
technogenic
contamination
(It is important
to identify the
presence of
various local
landscape-
geochemical
anomalies).*
Integrated
contamination index
dimension
less
Z
c
= ∑
C
i
MPC
i ,
where: Cj – actual concentration of the i-th
pollutant in soil; MPCj – maximum permissible
concentration of the i-th substance.
Humus content % Laboratory analysis
Soil fertility index points
Humus, pH, and NPK normalization (0–1 or 0–
100 scale)
Water regime
condition
index
Water quality assessment + level of
flooding/drainage condition
Level of biodiversity index Shannon index or species richness per unit area
Ecosystem functions points Expert assessment (self-regulation, resilience)
Ecosystem
state of land
(It is important
to identify
pollutants that
may migrate
and spread
within the
environment).
Level of degradation % / index Share of degraded land or integrated index
Table 2. System of indicators and algorithms aimed at identifying environmental constraints in
land economic valuation and restoration
Note
* Chemical pollution agents include vehicle fuel, lubricants, solvents, electroplating waste, explosive residues, decontamination substances,
heavy metals and their compounds, and radioactive substances.
*Technogenic pollution agents include components and factors arising from the destruction of infrastructure, engineering systems, and
military-industrial activities, which alter the physical and functional condition of land.
Source: compiled based on [1; 7; 3].
306
АГРОСВІТ № 10, 2026
ISSN 2306-6792Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
It should be noted that normalization of
indicators is necessary to transform heterogeneous
indicators, differing in units of measurement and
scale, into a unified dimensionless scale (typically
within the range from 0 to 1). This makes it possible
to ensure their comparability and to avoid the
dominance of indicators with larger numerical
values in the process of further integration.
2. Integration of indicators through an
integrated environmental index:
( )∑ ⋅ inorm,ieco Kw=I (2),
where: wі — weighting coefficient of the i-th
indicator (indicator significance); K(norm,i) —
normalized value of the i-th indicator.
The aggregation of indicators, through the
calculation of an integrated environmental index,
is necessary to synthesize multidimensional
information about the condition of land resources
into a single composite indicator. This enables a
comprehensive assessment of the environmental
state of a territory, given the varying significance
of individual parameters, as well as the risks of
toxic substance migration and their transfer into
plant-based agricultural products.
Moreover, the aforementioned approach
forms the foundation for the economic valuation
of land resources in de-occupied territories, which
should be considered through the prism of land
value, taking into account the environmental risks
and restoration costs identified in Table 2.
Notably, in order to determine the economic
(market) value of land resources in de-occupied
territories, it is not sufficient to rely solely on
conventional valuation approaches. Instead, a
hybrid approach should be applied, combining
market-based methods with adjustments for
environmental losses and restoration expenditures.
For this purpose, it is necessary to apply:
1. Calculation of the base market value (as if
the land plot were not located in de-occupied
territories), defined as the baseline (potential)
market value of undamaged land (Vо) [2; 4; 6]. This
refers to the standard market price based on a
comparative approach (the value of similar land
plots in the region).
2. Calculation of the market value of a land plot
in de-occupied territories:
V=S.P-S(Cm+Cr+Ce) (3),
where: S — area (ha); P — average market
price per 1 ha (UAH); Cm — demining costs per
1 ha; Cr — land reclamation costs per 1 ha; Ce —
environmental remediation costs per 1 ha.
Some scholars [4—5] also propose incor-
porating Lp into this formula, representing
productivity losses due to foregone income
(resulting from soil degradation, compaction,
erosion, and loss of humus):
( )
( )∑
⋅−T
=t
t
t
p
r+
PYY
=L
1
0
1
(4),
where: Y0 — normal (baseline) yield; Yt —
actual/expected yield; P — price of output
(agricultural products); r — discount rate; T —
recovery period.
Thus, the proposed approach transforms
conventional land valuation into an integrated
ecological and economic assessment, enabling a
more accurate representation of the actual con-
dition and potential of land resources in de-occu-
pied territories and providing a sound basis for
managerial, investment, and recovery-oriented
decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the scope of the outlined study, the
following approach to the ecological and
economic valuation of land on de-occupied terri-
tories is proposed. It is based on a comprehensive
eco-economic framework and, in particular,
makes it possible to overcome the limitations of
traditional market-based land valuation. The
developed provisions demonstrate that, unlike
classical approaches-which primarily take into
account current market conditions-the proposed
model integrates both economic and environ-
mental parameters of land use.
Specifically, it is argued that the value of land
in de-occupied territories is formed not only as a
market category, but also as a result of the impact
of: soil degradation processes; technogenic and
chemical contamination; physical damage to land
(including landmines); loss of productive potential;
the need for substantial restoration investments.
In this situation, the valuation acquires an
ecological and economic nature, as it combines:
an economic component (market value, income-
generating potential); an environmental com-
ponent (soil quality, level of contamination, degree
of degradation); a restorative component (costs of
reclamation, demining, and remediation).
The practical value of the developed approach
to the ecological and economic valuation of land
in de-occupied territories lies in its ability to:
provide a realistic, rather than overstated, market
value of land; account for hidden losses and future
costs that are ignored in classical models; form a
well-grounded basis for investment decisions, state
compensation policies, and territorial recovery
programs; ensure the alignment of economic
decisions with environmental safety; and increase
АГРОСВІТ № 10, 2026
307
ISSN 2306-6792 Copyright © The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
the reliability of valuation under conditions of high
uncertainty and risk.
Prospects for further research within this
thematic area involve deepening the methodological
toolkit of ecological and economic valuation. This
includes the development of clear algorithms for
integrating environmental and economic indicators,
the formalization of weighting coefficients for
different types of degradation, and the creation of
unified indicators applicable across regions. Without
this, the model will remain theoretically sound but
difficult to implement in practice.
Література:
1. Калінчик М., Слободяник А., Тараненко П.,
Настопиров В. Новітні підходи до оцінки земель-
них ресурсів України: оптимізація, новітні стра-
тегії та інноваційні рішення. Київський економі-
чний науковий журнал. 2024. № 6. C. 47—58.
2. Кошкалда І.В., Анопрієнко Т.В. Держав-
не регулювання проведення грошової оцінки
земель в Україні. Харків. нац. аграр. ун-т ім.
В.В. Докучаєва. Харків: ТОВ "ДІСА ПЛЮС",
2021. 222 с.
3. Лиса А. Екологи проаналізували грунт на
деокупованій Миколаївщині, Кореспондент,
2024. https://ua.korrespondent.net/ukraine/
4725258-ekolohy-proanalizuvaly-grunt-na-
deokupovanii-mykolaivschyni
4. Левандівський О.Т., Баланюк І.Ф., Ше-
ленко Д.І., Сас Л.С. Фінансовий механізм капі-
талізації земельних ресурсів сільськогоспо-
дарських підприємств регіону у взаємовідноси-
нах із територіальними громадами. Актуальні
проблеми розвитку економіки регіону, 2021.
№ 17 (2). С. 124—134.
5. .Третяк А.М., Третяк В.М., Вольська А.О.
Наукові проблеми методики нормативної гро-
шової оцінки земельних ділянок в Україні. На-
укові перспективи. 2022. № 3 (21). С. 131—144.
6. Сохнич А.Я. Грунтово-екологічний моні-
торинг: призначення та організаційні принци-
пи. Вісник ЛДАУ. 2001. № 4. С. 62—67.
7. Чи можна вилікувати грунт від війни —
відповіді на найпоширеніші запитання,
Kurkul.com, 2023 https://kurkul.com/spetspro-
ekty/1423-chi-mojna-vilikuvati-grunt-vid-viyni--
vidpovidi-na-nayposhirenishi-zapitannya
References:
1. Kalinchyk, M., Slobodianyk, A., Taranen-
ko, P., and Nastopirov, V. (2024), "New appro-
aches to the assessment of land resources of Ukrai-
ne: optimization, new strategies and innovative
solutions", Kyyivs'kyy ekonomichnyy naukovyy
zhurnal" vol. 6, pp. 47—58.
2. Koshkalda, I.V., and Anopriyenko, T.V.
(2021), Derzhavne rehulyuvannya provedennya
hroshovoyi otsinky zemel' v Ukrayini [State regu-
lation of monetary valuation of lands in Ukraine].
Kharkiv. nats. ahrar. un-t im. V. V. Dokuchayeva:
TOV "DISA PLYUS". Kharkiv, Ukraine.
3. Lysa, A. (2024), "Ecologists analyzed the soil
in the deoccupied Mykolaiv region", Korespon-
dent, available at: https://ua.korrespondent.net/
ukraine/4725258-ekolohy-proanalizuvaly-grunt-
na-deokupovanii-mykolaivschyni (Accessed
22.02. 2026).
4. Levandivskyi, O.T., Balanyuk, I.F., Shelen-
ko, D.I., and Sas, L.S. (2021), "Financial mechanism
for capitalization of land resources of agricultural
enterprises of the region in relations with territorial
communities", Aktual'ni problemy rozvytku
ekonomiky rehionu, vol. 17 (2), pp. 124—134.
5. Tretyak, A.M., Tretyak, V.M., and Vols-
ka, A.O. (2022), "Scientific problems of the
methodology of normative monetary valuation of
land plots in Ukraine", Naukovi perspektyvy,
vol. 3 (21), pp. 131—144.
6. Sokhnych, A.Ya. (2001), "Soil and ecological
monitoring: purpose and organizational prin-
ciples", Visnyk LDAU, vol. 4, pp. 62—67.
7. Kurkul.com (2023), "Can soil be cured of
war — answers to the most frequently asked
questions", available at: https://kurkul.com/
spetsproekty/1423-chi-mojna-vilikuvati-grunt-
vid-v iyni--vidpovidi-na-nayposhirenishi-
zapitannya (Accessed 22.02. 2026).
Отримано редакцією журналу / Received: 02.05.26
Прорецензовано / Revised: 11.05.26
Дата публікації / Published: 21.05.26
|
| id | www_nayka_com_ua-article-10331 |
| institution | Agrosvit |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-09T01:01:37Z |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| publisher | ДКС Центр |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | wwwnaykacomua/b4/9f75bc6b953c1e9c23b48d03c56c52b4.pdf |
| spelling | www_nayka_com_ua-article-103312026-06-08T08:39:19Z ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC VALUATION OF LAND IN DE-OCCUPIED TERRITORIES ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ Нагорна, О. В. Сальнікова, А. В. Іллєнко, В. В. Нагорний, В. В. ДКС Центр 2026-05-21 Article Article application/pdf https://www.nayka.com.ua/index.php/agrosvit/article/view/10331 10.32702/2306-6792.2026.10.301 Журнал "Агросвіт"; № 10 (2026): АГРОСВІТ; 301-307 Agrosvit; No. 10 (2026): AGROSVIT; 301-307 2306-6792 10.32702/2306-6792.2026.10 en https://www.nayka.com.ua/index.php/agrosvit/article/view/10331/10474 Авторське право (c) 2026 Журнал "Агросвіт" |
| spellingShingle | Нагорна, О. В. Сальнікова, А. В. Іллєнко, В. В. Нагорний, В. В. ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ |
| title | ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ |
| title_alt | ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC VALUATION OF LAND IN DE-OCCUPIED TERRITORIES |
| title_full | ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ |
| title_fullStr | ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ |
| title_full_unstemmed | ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ |
| title_short | ЕКОЛОГО-ЕКОНОМІЧНА ОЦІНКА ЗЕМЕЛЬНИХ УГІДЬ НА ДЕОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ |
| title_sort | еколого-економічна оцінка земельних угідь на деокупованих територіях |
| url | https://www.nayka.com.ua/index.php/agrosvit/article/view/10331 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nagornaov ecologicalandeconomicvaluationoflandindeoccupiedterritories AT salʹníkovaav ecologicalandeconomicvaluationoflandindeoccupiedterritories AT íllênkovv ecologicalandeconomicvaluationoflandindeoccupiedterritories AT nagornijvv ecologicalandeconomicvaluationoflandindeoccupiedterritories AT nagornaov ekologoekonomíčnaocínkazemelʹnihugídʹnadeokupovanihteritoríâh AT salʹníkovaav ekologoekonomíčnaocínkazemelʹnihugídʹnadeokupovanihteritoríâh AT íllênkovv ekologoekonomíčnaocínkazemelʹnihugídʹnadeokupovanihteritoríâh AT nagornijvv ekologoekonomíčnaocínkazemelʹnihugídʹnadeokupovanihteritoríâh |