Литовсько-польська доба в археології України

• Опубліковано в: Археологія
• Дата: 2017
• Випуск: 1
• Сторінки: 45-57
• ISSN: 2616-499X
• Автори та афіліації: Oleksandr P. Motsia — Institute of Archaeology, the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
• Автор: Motsia, Oleksandr P.
• Формат: Стаття
• Мова: Українська
• Опубліковано: Institute of Archaeology NAS of Ukraine 2017
• Теми: Велике князівство Литовське; Річ Посполита; місто; замок; вогнепальна зброя; кераміка.
• Онлайн доступ: https://arheologia.com.ua/index.php/arheologia/article/view/133
• Назва журналу: Chemistry, Physics and Technology of Surface

 The period from the 14th to the 17th century had gone down in history of Ukraine as a period when the majority of autochthonous population belonged to foreign state formations: Duchy of Lithuania and later Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. In both cases, upper ten of local community switched side of the new masters and gained corresponding benefits. However, in this case, we are interested in changes in material culture which are represented in corresponding archaeological base. First of all, the changes became apparent in city and castle building, which not only preserved Ancient Rus architectural traditions, namely usage of wood, the main local building material, but also in certain extent borrowed the Western and Central European experience in stone usage in new fortifications construction. New city centres also appeared in many cities, though the areas of old citadels were often used. Different tendencies were used in different regions, according to variations in their ecologic peculiarities. The main material innovations exhibit fire-arms arrival and usage: cannon at first, then rifles which gradually displaced old examples, first of all, bows and arrows. Pottery was developing rapidly, although pre-Mongolian forms often appeared in various regions. Glassware production had been also intensively developing since the 15th century. Nevertheless, on a whole, it should be stated that archaeological monuments of this period are studied insufficiently, and the historians know about it only from the written sources, of both home, and foreign origin.