Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software

When designing and developing software systems of any complexity, project risk management is important and necessary. Every software development project contains elements of uncertainty known as a project risk. The success of a software development project depends on the amount of risk that correspo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2020
1. Verfasser: Zubok, V. Yu.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:Ukrainisch
Veröffentlicht: Інститут проблем реєстрації інформації НАН України 2020
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:http://drsp.ipri.kiev.ua/article/view/207783
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Data Recording, Storage & Processing

Institution

Data Recording, Storage & Processing
_version_ 1856543170918088705
author Zubok, V. Yu.
author_facet Zubok, V. Yu.
author_sort Zubok, V. Yu.
baseUrl_str
collection OJS
datestamp_date 2020-09-09T14:08:32Z
description When designing and developing software systems of any complexity, project risk management is important and necessary. Every software development project contains elements of uncertainty known as a project risk. The success of a software development project depends on the amount of risk that corresponds to each project activity.The introduction of new RPKI technologies for Internet routing registry stakeholders has led to the emergence of a new single point of failure in the global Internet routing system. The issue of risk management, namely risk identification and classification during the development and operation of software for global routing registries, was not given enough attention to result in a global security incident. Errors in the management of project risk in the process of developing and updating the software of the European database of the routing registry led to the fact that the incident with the routes hijack by Rostelecom on April 1, 2020 became global. After unsuccessful software upgrade critical data was deleted from routing registry database and there was no comprehensive monitoring measures and response plan to prevent the increasing spread of the issue globally. The risk management errors, namely incorrect assessment of impact factors and further factor analysis is analyzed. Factor analysis demonstrated that the main security concerns of the software development and operation cycle were insufficient monitoring and the absence or inadequacy of a risk mitigation program. In result, on a several small steps of the security incident, the risk owner failed to avoid risk, control it or perform its transfer.In our example, there was added a FAIR approach as well-situated complementary method for risk decomposition. This way the main risk is described as a set of smaller, easily recognizable risks which management already has described by known avoidance steps and mitigation measures.  On an example of decomposition of data security, it is shown the reasonable points for risk identification, classification and prioritization for this security incident. Tabl.: 3. Refs: 9 titles.
first_indexed 2025-07-17T10:57:54Z
format Article
id drspiprikievua-article-207783
institution Data Recording, Storage & Processing
language Ukrainian
last_indexed 2025-07-17T10:57:54Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Інститут проблем реєстрації інформації НАН України
record_format ojs
spelling drspiprikievua-article-2077832020-09-09T14:08:32Z Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software Факторний аналіз ризиків на прикладі інциденту з програмним забезпеченням реєстру глобальної маршрутизації Zubok, V. Yu. управління ризиками глобальна маршрутизація безпека програмного забезпечення перехоплення маршрутів кібербезпека risk management global Internet routing software security route hijack cybersecurity When designing and developing software systems of any complexity, project risk management is important and necessary. Every software development project contains elements of uncertainty known as a project risk. The success of a software development project depends on the amount of risk that corresponds to each project activity.The introduction of new RPKI technologies for Internet routing registry stakeholders has led to the emergence of a new single point of failure in the global Internet routing system. The issue of risk management, namely risk identification and classification during the development and operation of software for global routing registries, was not given enough attention to result in a global security incident. Errors in the management of project risk in the process of developing and updating the software of the European database of the routing registry led to the fact that the incident with the routes hijack by Rostelecom on April 1, 2020 became global. After unsuccessful software upgrade critical data was deleted from routing registry database and there was no comprehensive monitoring measures and response plan to prevent the increasing spread of the issue globally. The risk management errors, namely incorrect assessment of impact factors and further factor analysis is analyzed. Factor analysis demonstrated that the main security concerns of the software development and operation cycle were insufficient monitoring and the absence or inadequacy of a risk mitigation program. In result, on a several small steps of the security incident, the risk owner failed to avoid risk, control it or perform its transfer.In our example, there was added a FAIR approach as well-situated complementary method for risk decomposition. This way the main risk is described as a set of smaller, easily recognizable risks which management already has described by known avoidance steps and mitigation measures.  On an example of decomposition of data security, it is shown the reasonable points for risk identification, classification and prioritization for this security incident. Tabl.: 3. Refs: 9 titles. При проектуванні та розробці програмних систем будь-якої складнос-ті важливим і необхідним є управління проектним ризиком. Методологія базується на аналізі загроз, реалізація яких може певним чином вплинути на систему та її власника. Впровадження нових технологій RPKI призвело до появи нової єдиної точки відмови в системі глобальної маршрутизації мережі Інтернет. Питанню поводження з ризиками в процесі розробки та експлуатації програмного забезпечення для реєстрів глобальної маршрутизації було приділено недостатньо уваги, в результаті чого стався глобальний інцидент безпеки, який класифікується як «перехоплення маршрутів». Проведено аналіз помилок ризик-менеджменту методом декомпозиції основного ризику та подальшого факторного аналізу. Інститут проблем реєстрації інформації НАН України 2020-05-25 Article Article application/pdf http://drsp.ipri.kiev.ua/article/view/207783 10.35681/1560-9189.2020.1.1.207783 Data Recording, Storage & Processing; Vol. 22 No. 1 (2020); 49-55 Регистрация, хранение и обработка данных; Том 22 № 1 (2020); 49-55 Реєстрація, зберігання і обробка даних; Том 22 № 1 (2020); 49-55 1560-9189 uk http://drsp.ipri.kiev.ua/article/view/207783/208522 Авторське право (c) 2021 Реєстрація, зберігання і обробка даних
spellingShingle risk management
global Internet routing
software security
route hijack
cybersecurity
Zubok, V. Yu.
Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software
title Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software
title_alt Факторний аналіз ризиків на прикладі інциденту з програмним забезпеченням реєстру глобальної маршрутизації
title_full Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software
title_fullStr Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software
title_full_unstemmed Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software
title_short Risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software
title_sort risk factor analysis of an example of an incident with global routing registry software
topic risk management
global Internet routing
software security
route hijack
cybersecurity
topic_facet управління ризиками
глобальна маршрутизація
безпека програмного забезпечення
перехоплення маршрутів
кібербезпека
risk management
global Internet routing
software security
route hijack
cybersecurity
url http://drsp.ipri.kiev.ua/article/view/207783
work_keys_str_mv AT zubokvyu riskfactoranalysisofanexampleofanincidentwithglobalroutingregistrysoftware
AT zubokvyu faktornijanalízrizikívnaprikladííncidentuzprogramnimzabezpečennâmreêstruglobalʹnoímaršrutizacíí