АНАЛІЗ КЛАСИФІКАЦІЙ ІННОВАЦІЙ ЗА РІВНЕМ НОВИЗНИ

The article considers different types of innovation classifications depending on the novelty level. Themain approaches to the classification of innovations by domestic and foreign researchers such asYu.M. Bazhal, O.I. Volkov, V.H. Voronkova, A. Gosnar, A.P. Hrechan, M.P. Denysenko, P.N. Zavlin,M.A....

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2018
Автор: Коліщук, О. В.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:Українська
Опубліковано: Odesa National University of Technology 2018
Онлайн доступ://journals.ontu.edu.ua/index.php/fie/article/view/1062
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Food Industry Economics

Репозитарії

Food Industry Economics
Опис
Резюме:The article considers different types of innovation classifications depending on the novelty level. Themain approaches to the classification of innovations by domestic and foreign researchers such asYu.M. Bazhal, O.I. Volkov, V.H. Voronkova, A. Gosnar, A.P. Hrechan, M.P. Denysenko, P.N. Zavlin,M.A. Yokhna, A.K. Kazantsev, R.S. Kostsyk, L.E Mindeli, G. Mensh, A.Y. Pryhozhyn, N.M. Syrotynska,V.V. Stadnyk, D.M. Stepanenko, L.I. Fedulova and Y. Schumpeter has been analyzed here. In particular, wehave reviewed the classification of innovations by their role in the implementation of goals, significance forthe actual activity direction, intensity of innovative changes, level of objective perception, reasons of origin,innovation level and potential, novelty of the implementation place and by its predecessor character. Themain factors that formed the basis of the mentioned classifications have been defined. We have concludedthat the classification model suggested by the German scientist G. Mensch is the basis of the above mentioned classification types, which is the most objective and unified and can be used at all stages of the lifecycle of innovations in order to accelerate the process of defining the innovation levels, depending on theirnovelty and the possibility of practical implementation. We have come to the conclusion that the classificationsuggested by G. Mensh requires further research with the purpose of making more detailed innovation differentiation based on its importance at each stage of implementation, priority of use and determination of waysto improve scientific, technical, technological, organizational, marketing, economic, informational, social andother processes.