БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ
Species composition of oats diseases in the Right-bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine has been clarified. Results of application of biological fungicides by the method of seed dressing and surface treatment for the protection of tunicate (Chernihivskyi 28 variety) and hull-less (Samuel variety) oats are p...
Saved in:
| Date: | 2017 |
|---|---|
| Author Affiliations: |
|
| Keywords: | keywords |
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English Ukrainian |
| Published: |
Institute of Agrocultural Microbiology and Agro-industrial Manufacture of NAAS of Ukraine
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/102 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Journal Title: | Agriciltural microbiology |
| Download file: |
|
Institution
Agriciltural microbiology| _version_ | 1871465334327738368 |
|---|---|
| author | Ретьман, С. В. Панченко, Ю. С. |
| author_facet | Ретьман, С. В. Панченко, Ю. С. |
| author_institution_txt_mv | [
{
"author": "С. В. Ретьман",
"institution": "Інститут захисту рослин НААН"
},
{
"author": "Ю. С. Панченко",
"institution": "Інститут захисту рослин НААН"
}
] |
| author_sort | Ретьман, С. В. |
| baseUrl_str | https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/oai |
| collection | OJS |
| datestamp_date | 2026-07-22T10:10:41Z |
| description | Species composition of oats diseases in the Right-bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine has been clarified. Results of application of biological fungicides by the method of seed dressing and surface treatment for the protection of tunicate (Chernihivskyi 28 variety) and hull-less (Samuel variety) oats are provided. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.35868/1997-3004.25.50-56 |
| first_indexed | 2025-07-17T12:23:01Z |
| format | Article |
| fulltext |
UDC 633.13+632.952
BIOLOGICAL AGENTS TO PROTECT OATS AGAINST DISEASES IN RIGHT-
BANK FOREST STEPPE UKRAINE
S. V. Retman, Yu. S. Panchenko
Institute of Plant Protection, NAAS, Kyiv, Ukraine,
e-mail: panchenko_yurij@i.ua
Species composition of oats diseases in the Right-bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine has been
clarified. Results of application of biological fungicides by the method of seed dressing and surface
treatment for the protection of tunicate (Chernihivskyi 28 variety) and hull-less (Samuel variety)
oats are provided.
Key words: tunicate oats, hull-less oats, pathogen, biological fungicides, efficiency, yield.
Common oat (Avena sativa L.) is one of the crops that are crucial for increasing grain
production. In Ukraine, it is grown mainly in the Forest-steppe and Polissia (gross harvest of grain
is 499 thousand tons, yield is 2.4 t/ha). The largest crop areas were in Volyn (39.5 thousand ha),
Zhytomyr (30.4 thousand ha), Chernihiv (28.0 thousand ha), Rivne (21.2 thousand ha), Lviv
(16.2 thousand ha) regions.
In recent years, due to increased heat supply during the growing season and violations of
growing technologies, the phytosanitary state of crops, including oats, has deteriorated significantly.
The following diseases damage culture crops.
Covered (stinking) smut; pathogen – Ustilago korelli Wille. The disease is widespread,
manifested in the period of throwing comfrey, in which all the grains are black. The plant is
affected during germination of seeds from gem and germinating teliospores on its surface. Type of
infection – intermediate or external [1, 2, 6].
Dust smut; pathogen – Ustilago avenae (Pers.) Rostrup. The disease manifests in the period
of throwing comfrey, in which all the elements of the flower and set have the form of black-olive
mass of spores. The main source of infection is seeds with hemes under the films. Infection of
plants occurs in the soil during germination, despite the fact that the contamination with spores and
some development of the mycelium under the films occurs during the flowering of plants.
Harmfulness of the disease is due to the reduction of the similarity of the seeds and the density of
planting. Shortfall of smuts diseases in some countries can reach 70 % [1, 2, 6].
Steam rust; pathogen – Puccinia graminis (Pers.) Pers. f.sp. avenae. The disease is
widespread in Polissia and in the western regions of the Forest-steppe; it manifests in the flowering
phase – milk ripeness of grain on the stems, leaf sheaths, awns, and spike scales in the form of rust-
mailto:panchenko_yurij@i.ua
brown, elongated pads of uridinies with uridine spores, which are placed on the plant in the form of
brown torn bands. The harmfulness of stem rust is due to impaired water balance of plants
(enhanced transpiration). In case of the epiphytotic development of the disease, the causative agent
forms up to 0.5 uridine spores per 1 hectare of crops (300 mln pieces is in 1 g). Upon the severe
development of the disease, shortfall of the crop, due to so-called leakage of grain, can reach 70 %.
Its quality also worsens: the content of asparagine and glutamic acid in the grains decreases. The
main source of infection is seeds with hemes under the films. Infection of plants occurs in the soil
during germination, despite the fact that the contamination with spores and some development of
the mycelium under the films occurs during the flowering of plants [1, 2, 6].
Crown rust; pathogen – Puccinia coronata Corda. It is spread in all growing zones, mostly in
the Forest-steppe. In favourable years, the distribution reaches 100 %, and development – 53.6 %.
The massive manifestation of the disease on plants is observed in the phase of flowering-filling of
grain. Powdery, orange, rounded uridinies forms on the leaves, leaf sheaths, stems, and spike scales,
later black teliopustules are formed around them, which remain under the epidermis. During the
summer, the fungus can give 2-3 generations of uridine spores; the pathogen has no self-protection
mechanism known for other rusty fungi. The number of pustules increases with increasing spore
concentration to 1250/cm
2
, and there is no tendency for stabilization. Epiphytotic development of
the disease can cause the death of plants within 23 days from the time of the appearance of the first
single of uridinies. Upon the severe damage to the plants, the feeble grain is formed, its quality
deteriorates, yields decrease to 70 %, and under favourable weather conditions direct losses can
reach 100 % [1, 2, 3-6].
Mildew; pathogen –Blumeria graminis DC f.sp. avenae Em. Marchal (syn. Erysipharmic DC
.f. tritici Em. Marchal). The disease manifests during the vegetation of plants. On the seedling, it
first appears on the sheath of the leaves in the form of matte spots, and later in the form of a white
loose plaque, which is sealed and converted into wadded pads. Plaque spreads on a leafy plate,
often from the upper, and sometimes from both sides. With the growth of plants, plaque spreads on
stems, leaves, leaf sheaths, and spires. The pathogen forms a conical sporulation and ascogenous
stage. Infection of plants occurs at a temperature of 0-20 °С and relative humidity of air of 50-
100 %. High air temperature (over 30 °C) retards the development of mildew. Harmfulness of the
disease is due to the reduction in the assimilation surface of the leaves, the destruction of
chlorophyll and other pigments, as a result of which the intensity of photosynthesis decreases. In the
case of intense damage, the development of the root system is slowed down, the productive planting
of the plants decreases, the ejection delays, and maturation accelerates. Shortfall of crop from the
disease is 10-15 % [1, 2, 6].
Red-brown spotting or helminthosporiose; pathogen – Pyrenophora avenae Itoet. Kurib.
(anamorph: Dreshlera avenae (Eidam) Sharif). The main source of infection is the mycelium and
conidia of the fungus on the affected remnants and in the form of conidia on the grain. An
additional source – the affected remnants, which retain the perithecia of the fungus. Conidia are
grown in the temperature range of 5-33 °C (optimum 18-24 °C) and air humidity above 96 %. The
incubation period of the disease development at optimal temperature lasts for 5 days. The disease is
widespread, especially harmful in the Forest-steppe; appears on the leaves in the form of dark-
brown, dark-gray, or brown-red, oblong, fibre-limited spots. In the wet weather, dark-oily plaque
appears on them, which is the conidial sporulation of the pathogen of the disease. The affected
leaves dry and prematurely die. In case of severe lesion (sometimes up to 75 %), feeble grains are
formed, and shortfall is more than 10 % [1-4, 6].
Leaf blotch; pathogen – Phaeosphaeria avenaria (G.F.Weber) O.Eriksson f.sp. avenae
(Stagnospora avenae (A.B.Frank) Bisset). The disease manifests on the leaves, sheath, stem, and
spike scales, first in the form of small chlorotic spots, which later become oblong. The damaged
tissue lightens in the center of the spots, and a brown rim is formed on the edge of a healthy and
damaged tissue. On the affected tissue, there are numerous black dots – pycnidia of the pathogen.
The affected leaves are necrotized and die. On the stems of the plants, the spots are first light, then
blacken and become shiny. In these places, the stem putrefies and breaks out. The disease mostly
develops in wet weather in the second half of vegetation, but sometimes it also appears on sprouting
(the damage can reach 15 %). Harmfulness of the disease is due to the deterioration of the main
parameters of the structure of the crop. Shortfall of crop can reach 20 % or more [1, 2, 6, 10].
Brown spotting or heterosporium disease; pathogen – Heterosporium avenae Oudem. The
disease manifests on the leaves in the form of fallow or brown spots, on which dark turfs – conidial
sporulation of the fungus – are placed by the longitudinal lines. Harmfulness of the disease, like all
other spotting in oats, is manifested in premature death of affected leaves, reduction of plant
productivity [1, 2, 6].
Ordinary root rot; pathogen – Cochliobulus sativus (Itoet Kurib.) Drechslet Dastur
(anamorph: Drechslera sorociniana Subram (syn. Bipolaris sorociniana Subram; Helmintisporium
sativum P.K.et. B.)). The pathogen develops mainly in the conidial stage. The spread of infection is
facilitated by windy and rainy weather (the damage to plants can reach 17 %). Ascogenous
(teliomorphic) stage in the pathogen development cycle is almost lost in the planting phase. At the
beginning, small dark spots appear, which later expand to a length of 1.5 cm, dark-brown or dark-
gray in the centre, pale at the edge. On the damaged tissues, black or olive-brown plaque of fungus
sporulation is formed during wet weather. Ellipsoidal, light-brown to black spots are formed on the
leaves during further stage of plant development, and in most cases they have a light rim and a clear
border between healthy and damaged tissue. At the base of stem, upon mild disease development, it
manifests in the form of dark-brown necrotic strips, colour of which gradually passes to a healthy
tissue, that is, they do not have a clear boundary between healthy and damaged tissue. During the
intensive development of the disease, the base of the steam blackens and putrefies down to the
lower node of the stem [1, 2, 6, 10].
To protect oat from diseases, an integrated approach is needed for the development and
implementation of protective measures, which follows from the concept of “integrated plant
protection”. An important factor in the “ecologization” of the protection systems is the use of
environmentally safe means of protection, in particular biofungicides, which is relevant in the
growing of oats, grain of which is a raw material for the production of products for children and
dietary nutrition. These preparations immunize the plant by way of forming non-specific systemic
resistance to pathogens and to a number of adverse environmental factors: drought, low and high
temperatures. The preparations also have direct fungicidal action on the pathogens, they activate the
growth processes in plants, contribute to the improvement of their mineral nutrition due to the
nitrogen fixation from the air; transformation of insoluble forms of phosphates into a digestible
form; reproduction, activation of the useful microflora [7, 8].
In connection with the above-mentioned, the objective of our study was to monitor the
phytosanitary state of oat crops, clarify the species composition of pathogens, assess the
effectiveness of biofungicides under different technological methods of application and
determination of and crop yields.
Materials and methods. The study was carried out in 2015-2016 at the experimental plots of
the State Enterprise Experimental Base “Oleksandria” (Right-Bank Forest-steppe), the size of plots
was 25m
2
, the placement of plots is randomized, the repetition is four-time. Chaffy oat (A. sativa
subsp. Sativa Rod. et Sold.) of Chernihivskyi 28 variety and naked oats (A. sativa subsp. nudi sativa
(Husnot) Rod. et Sold.) of Samuel variety was sowed. Biofungicides Haupsyn (Pseudomonas
aurefaciens B-111 and B-306, titre of viable cells is of 1x10
4
per 1 µg of preparation) was applied
for inoculation with a consumption rate (CR) of 6 L/t; for surface treatment (on the leave) with CR
of 4 L/ha and Phitocyd (Bacillus subtilis at the amount of (1-9) x 10
9
CFU/cm
3
) for seed
bacterization with CR of 1.5 L/t. Determination of the degree of disease development, technical
effectiveness of preparations and yield of culture were carried out according to generally accepted
methods [9].
To determine the intensity of the disease development (R, %), the average percentage of
disease development was calculated according to the formula:
,100
4N
bn
R
where
n – number of diseased plants (pcs),
N – total number of accountable plants (pcs),
b – appropriate involvement score
bn
– sum of products of the number of plants on the corresponding involvement score, 4
– the highest score of the 5-point scale.
Species of pathogens was determined according to the cultural and morphological features [2,
10-13]:
Puccinia coronata Corda: aeciospores are multifaceted, spherical, 16-24 x 12-18 µm.
Uridinies are of 0.2-0.6 mm long, powdery, orange, spherical (14-26 x 12-18 µms) with a long,
scabrous shell. Teliospores of different shapes, predominantly clavate (32-64 x 12-24 µm) with a
thickened sheath on top of up to 3.5 µm, with corona-like germs.
Blumeria graminis DC f.sp. avenae Em. Marchal (syn. Erysiphegra minis DC. F. tritici Em
Marchal): conidia are single-celled, colourless, cylindrical or barrel-shaped, of 25-30 x 8-10 µm in
size, placed in chains on single-celled, slightly elongated conidiophores. Ascogenous stage of the
fungus is characterized by the formation of cleistocarp with ascus and ascospore on mycelium.
Cleistocarps are round, initially brown, and eventually black, 135-180 µm in diameter, have a small
number of light, short appendages. They have several asci of 70-100 x 25-40 µm in size. Each ascus
contains 4-8 colourless elliptical ascospores of 20-23 x 11-13 µm in size.
Pyrenophora avenae Itoet Kurib. (anamorph: Dreshlera avenae (Eidam) Sharif):
conidiophores are chimneys, cylindrical, thickened at the base, up to 200 µm long and 9-12 µm in
thickness. The conidia are light-olive, cylindrical, slightly thickened in the middle, and they are
rounded near the top with 3-8 transverse membranes, smooth with thick sheath (8-110 x 15-20 μm).
Phaeosphaeria avenaria (G.F.Weber) O.Eriksson f.sp. avenae (Stagonospora avenae
(A.B.Frank) Bisset): pycnida are spherical, black, with a diameter of 40-140 µm. Pycnospores are
colourless, cylindrical, straight or slightly curved (20-45 x 3-4 µm) have 2-5 transverse membranes.
Conidia are colourless, sticky, straight or curved, 20-45 x 3-4 µm, with three membranes.
Cochliobulus sativus (Itoet Kurib.) Drechslet Dastur (anamorph: Drechslera sorociniana
Subram (syn. Bipolaris sorociniana Subram; Helmintisporium sativum P.K. et B.)): mycelium of
the pathogen is dark-coloured; conidiophores are single or collected in groups of 2-3 kneed olive
(up to 130 µm in length); forms conidia on the tops. They are dark-olive, egg or spindle-shaped,
sometimes curved, with 3-13 transverse membranes, 60-134 x 17-30 µm in size.
Heterosporium avenae Oudem: conidiophores are beam-shaped by 6-10 pieces, nodular-
curved, multicellular. The conidia are originally unicellular, later two-cell, light-smoky, rounded at
the ends, 18-35 x 9-14 µm in size.
Results and discussion. According to the results of monitoring of oat crops of both studied
varieties during the growing season, ordinary root rot, mildew, red-brown spotting, crown rust, leaf
blotch and heterosporium disease were found. It should be noted that the development of detected
diseases in Chernihivskyi 28 variety was higher than that of Samuel variety, and it was (average for
two years): for root rot – 25.0 and 17.5 %; for mildew – 46.6 and 37.2 %; for red-brown spotting –
33.5 and 35.5 %; for crown rust – 25.4 and 14,5 %, by varieties respectively (Table 1 and 2).
Table 1. Technical efficiency of biofungicides for inoculation of seeds, Chernihivskyi 28
variety
Variants of
experiment
Technical efficiency,%
Y
ie
ld
,
t/
h
a
o
rd
in
ar
y
r
o
o
t
ro
t
le
af
b
lo
tc
h
m
il
d
ew
re
d
-b
ro
w
n
sp
o
tt
in
g
cr
o
w
n
r
u
st
h
et
er
o
sp
o
ri
u
m
d
is
ea
se
(
л
и
ш
е
в
2
0
1
6
р
.)
Control* (25,0) (36,0) (46,6) (33,5) (25,4) (17,0) 4,75
Haupsyn 59,2 46,7 51,1 40,2 30,6 38,3 5,65
Phitocyd 61,1 46,2 50,2 42,7 32,0 40,1 5,60
LSD05 0,31
*- the disease in control
Table 2. Technical efficiency of biofungicides for inoculation of seeds, Samuel variety
Variants of
experiment
Technical efficiency,%
Y
ie
ld
,
t/
h
а
o
rd
in
ar
y
r
o
o
t
ro
t
le
af
b
lo
tc
h
(
л
и
ш
е
в
2
0
1
6
р
.)
m
il
d
ew
re
d
-b
ro
w
n
sp
o
tt
in
g
cr
o
w
n
r
u
st
h
et
er
o
sp
o
ri
u
m
d
is
ea
se
(л
и
ш
е
в
2
0
1
6
р
.)
Control* (17,5) (18,3) (37,2) (35,5) (14,5) (10,3) 6,05
Haupsyn 55,1 59,0 49,0 46,3 42,0 37,1 7,50
Phitocyd 55,3 57,5 53,5 48,2 47,7 36,5 7,49
LSD0,5 1,10
*- the disease in control
The development of leaf blotch in Chernihivskyi 28 variety was 36.0 % (average for two
years), in Samuel variety – 18.3 % (detected in 2016 only). Heterosporium disease was diagnosed in
both varieties in 2016 only, and the degree of its development was 17.0 and 10.3 %.
Application of biofungicides Haupsyn and Phitocyd (upon seed treatment) provided the
highest technical efficiency in both varieties against the ordinary root rot – 55.1-61.1 %; leaf blotch
– 46.2-59.0 %; mildew 49.0-51.1 %. The effectiveness of the studied preparations against crown
rust and heterosporium disease was the lowest – 30.6-47.7 % and 36.5-40.1 %, respectively.
Upon the superficial treatment of oat crops by biofungicide Haupsyn, the highest technical
efficiency was observed against heterosporium disease – up to 63.3 %; leaf blotch – up to 60.2 %;
crown rust – up to 59.7 %; and the lowest against the red-brown spotting – up to 42.0 % (Table 3,
4).
Table 3. Technical efficiency of biofungicide Haupsyn for surface treatment of plant (on
leaf), Chernihivskyi 28 variety
Variants of
experiment
Technical efficiency,%
Y
ie
ld
,
t/
h
а
le
af
b
lo
tc
h
m
il
d
ew
re
d
-b
ro
w
n
sp
o
tt
in
g
cr
o
w
n
r
u
st
h
et
er
o
sp
o
ri
u
m
d
is
ea
se
(
л
и
ш
е
в
2
0
1
6
р
.)
Control* (36,0) (46,6) (33,5) (25,4) (17,0) 4,75
Haupsyn 60,2 46,3 42,0 59,7 63,3 5,25
LSD0,5 0,50
* - the disease in control
Table 4. Technical efficiency of biofungicide Haupsyn for surface treatment of plant (on
leaf), Samuel variety
Variants of
experiment
Technical efficiency,%
Y
ie
ld
,
t/
h
a
се
п
то
р
іо
з
(л
и
ш
е
в
2
0
1
6
р
.)
m
il
d
ew
re
d
-b
ro
w
n
sp
o
tt
in
g
cr
o
w
n
r
u
st
h
et
er
o
sp
o
ri
u
m
d
is
ea
se
(
л
и
ш
е
в
2
0
1
6
р
.)
Control* 18,3* 37,2 35,5 14,5 10,3 6,05
Haupsyn 57,3 51,8 40,3 40,2 54,1 7,10
LSD0,5 0,70
* - the disease in control
It should be noted that the effect of this biofungicide on the development of heterosporium
disease was quite differentiated: upon treatment of seeds, it provided higher efficiency compared
with superficial treatment.
The application of the studied biofungicides provided a higher yield on both varieties. The
retained crop upon inoculation of seeds was 0.90-0.85 t/ha (18.9 %) for Chernihivskyi 28 variety
and 1.45 t/ha (24.0 %) for Samuel variety. Upon superficial treatment (on a leaves) by Haupsyn, the
retained crop was at the level of 0.95 t/ha (15.7 %).
Consequently, during the study period, crops of the chaffy and naked oat were damaged by:
ordinary root rot (Cochliobulus sativus Itoet Kurib), leaf blotch (Phaeosphaeria avenaria
(G. F. Weber) O.Eriksson f.sp. avenae (Stagonospora avenae (A. B. Frank) Bisset), mildew
(Blumeria graminis DC f. sp. avenae Em Marchal), red-brown spotting (Pyrenophora avenae Itoet
Kurib, anamorph: Dreshlera avenae (Eidam) Sharif), heterosporium disease (Heterosporium
avenae Oudem), and crown rust (Puccinia coronata Corda), the development of which was 17.0-
46.6 % for Chernihivsky 28 variety and 10.3-37.2 % for Samuel variety.
Biofungicides Haupsyn and Phitocyd showed the greatest efficiency against ordinary root rot,
leaf blotch, and mildew (technical efficiency of 46.2-61.1 %) upon treatment of seeds at the CR of
6 L/t and 1.5 L/t, respectively.
Technical efficiency of Haupsyn for superficial treatment with CR of 4 L/ha was the highest
against heterosporium disease, leaf blotch, and crown rust (up to 59.7-63.3 %).
The application of studied biofungicides to protect oats contributed to retain of crops at the
level of 15.7-24.0 %.
The obtained results can be used to develop an effective and environmentally-oriented system
for protecting the culture, especially for the production of children’s and dietary nutrition.
1. Марков І. Діагностика вівса / Іван Марков // Агробізнес. ― 2014. ― № 1-2. ― С.
16−20.
2. Марков І. Л. Практикум із сільськогосподарської фітопатології : навч.посіб. /
І. Л. Марков. ― К. : ННЦ ІАЕ, 2011. ― С. 19–20.
3. Поплавская Н. Г. Патогенный комплекс грибов, паразитирующих на овсе
(литературный обзор) / Н. Г. Поплавская // Защита растений : сборник научных трудов. ―
2012. ― № 36. ― С. 125–132.
4. Буга С. Ф. Защита овса от болезней / С. Ф. Буга, А. Г. Жуковский, Т. Н. Жердецкая //
Защита растений : сборник научных трудов. ― 2011. ― № 35. ― С. 85–98.
5. Куцак М. М. Поширення та розвиток корончастої іржі вівса у Лісостепу України /
М. М. Куцак // Тези доп. конф. молодих учених "Екологічно обґрунтований захист рослин"
(Київ, 4 – 7 жовтня 2005 р.). ― К. : Колобіг, 2005. ― С. 126–128.
6. Agrios Georg N. Plant Pathology/ Georg N. Agrios. ― ACADEMIC PRESS, 2005. ―
P. 300–348.
7. Биологическая защита растений / [М. В. Штернис, Ф. С.-У. Джалилов,
И. В. Андреева и др.]; под ред. М. В. Штернис. ― М. : Колос, 2004. ― С. 192–200.
8. Теслюк В. В. Концептуальні основи виробництва і застосування мікобіопрепаратів /
Теслюк В. В. // Наукові доповіді НУБіП, 2011. ― 7(23). ― Режим доступу:
http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/Nd/2011_7/11tbbpam.pdf
9. Методика випробування і застосування пестицидів/ [С. О. Трибель, Д. Д. Сігарьова,
М. П. Секун та ін.]; за ред. проф. С. О. Трибеля. ― К. : Світ, 2001. ― С.267–270.
10. Болезни сельскохозяйственных культур: в 3 т. [под ред. В. Ф. Пересыпкина]. ― К. :
Урожай. ― Т. 1: Болезни зерновых и зернобобовых культур, 1989. ― 216 с.
11. Степанов К. М. Ржавчина зерновых культур / К. М. Степанов. ― Л. : Колос, 1975.
― 72 с.
12. Визначник грибів України: в 5 т. [за ред. Д. К. Зерова]. ― Том ІІ Аскоміцети. ― К. :
Наукова думка, 1969. ― 520 с.
13. Микроорганизмы – возбудители болезней растений / [Билай В. И., Гвоздяк Р. И.,
Скрипаль И. Г. и др.]; под ред. Билай В. И. ― К. : Наукова думка, 1989. ― С. 14–223.
http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/Nd/2011_7/11tbbpam.pdf
БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРЕПАРАТЫ
ДЛЯ ЗАЩИТЫ ОВСА ОТ БОЛЕЗНЕЙ
В ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОЙ ЛЕСОСТЕПИ
УКРАИНЫ
Ретьман С.В., Панченко Ю.С.
Институт защиты растений НААН, г. Киев
Уточнен видовой состав болезней
овса в Правобережной Лесостепи
Украины. Представлены результаты
применения биологических фунгицидов
способом протравливания семян и
поверхностной обработки для защиты
овса пленочном (сорт Черниговский 28) и
голозерного (сорт Самуэль).
Ключевые слова: овес пленочный,
овес голозерний, возбудитель,
биологические фунгициды
эффективность, урожай.
БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ
ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У
ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ
УКРАЇНИ
Ретьман С.В., Панченко Ю.С.
Інститут захисту рослин НААН, м. Київ
Уточнено видовий склад хвороб вівса
в Правобережному Лісостепу України.
Висвітлено результати застосування
біологічних фунгіцидів способом
протравлювання насіння та поверхневої
обробки для захисту вівса плівчастого
(сорт Чернігівський 28) та голозерного
(сорт Самуель).
Ключові слова: овес плівчастий, овес
голозерний, збудник, біологічні фунгіциди,
ефективність, урожай.
|
| id | oai:ojs2.smic.in.ua:article-102 |
| institution | Agriciltural microbiology |
| keywords_txt_mv | keywords |
| language | English Ukrainian |
| last_indexed | 2026-07-23T01:00:23Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Institute of Agrocultural Microbiology and Agro-industrial Manufacture of NAAS of Ukraine |
| record_format | ojs |
| resource_txt_mv | smicinua/e1/cd077dacebc89740ae1fa1102711f7e1.pdf |
| spelling | oai:ojs2.smic.in.ua:article-1022026-07-22T10:10:41Z BIOLOGICAL AGENTS TO PROTECT OATS AGAINST DISEASES IN RIGHTBANK FOREST STEPPE UKRAINE БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ Ретьман, С. В. Панченко, Ю. С. tunicate oats, hull-less oats, pathogen, biological fungicides, efficiency, yield. овес плівчастий, овес голозерний, збудник, біологічні фунгіциди, ефективність, урожай Species composition of oats diseases in the Right-bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine has been clarified. Results of application of biological fungicides by the method of seed dressing and surface treatment for the protection of tunicate (Chernihivskyi 28 variety) and hull-less (Samuel variety) oats are provided. Уточнено видовий склад хвороб вівса в Правобережному Лісостепу України. Висвітлено результати застосування біологічних фунгіцидів способом протравлювання насіння та поверхневої обробки для захисту вівса плівчастого (сорт Чернігівський 28) та голозерного (сорт Самуель). Institute of Agrocultural Microbiology and Agro-industrial Manufacture of NAAS of Ukraine 2017-06-29 Article Article Рецензована Стаття application/pdf application/pdf https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/102 10.35868/1997-3004.25.50-56 Agricultural microbiology; Vol. 25 (2017): Agriciltural microbiology; 50-56 Сільськогосподарська мікробіологія; Том 25 (2017): Сільськогосподарська мікробіологія; 50-56 1997-3004 10.35868/1997-3004.25 en uk https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/102/98 https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/102/100 Авторське право (c) 2017 S. V. Retman, Yu. S. Panchenko https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| spellingShingle | овес плівчастий овес голозерний збудник біологічні фунгіциди ефективність урожай Ретьман, С. В. Панченко, Ю. С. БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ |
| title | БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ |
| title_alt | BIOLOGICAL AGENTS TO PROTECT OATS AGAINST DISEASES IN RIGHTBANK FOREST STEPPE UKRAINE |
| title_full | БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ |
| title_fullStr | БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ |
| title_full_unstemmed | БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ |
| title_short | БІОЛОГІЧНІ ПРЕПАРАТИ ДЛЯ ЗАХИСТУ ВІВСА ВІД ХВОРОБ У ПРАВОБЕРЕЖНОМУ ЛІСОСТЕПУ УКРАЇНИ |
| title_sort | біологічні препарати для захисту вівса від хвороб у правобережному лісостепу україни |
| topic | овес плівчастий овес голозерний збудник біологічні фунгіциди ефективність урожай |
| topic_facet | tunicate oats hull-less oats pathogen biological fungicides efficiency yield. овес плівчастий овес голозерний збудник біологічні фунгіциди ефективність урожай |
| url | https://smic.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/102 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT retʹmansv biologicalagentstoprotectoatsagainstdiseasesinrightbankforeststeppeukraine AT pančenkoûs biologicalagentstoprotectoatsagainstdiseasesinrightbankforeststeppeukraine AT retʹmansv bíologíčnípreparatidlâzahistuvívsavídhvorobupravoberežnomulísostepuukraíni AT pančenkoûs bíologíčnípreparatidlâzahistuvívsavídhvorobupravoberežnomulísostepuukraíni |